Neonatal anthropometry outcomes comparing two gestational weight gain standards

Simple item page
dc.catalogadorjca
dc.contributor.authorMardones Santander, Francisco José
dc.contributor.authorRosso Rosso, Pedro Pablo
dc.contributor.authorFarías Jofré, Marcelo Enrique
dc.contributor.authorUlloa, Sofía
dc.contributor.authorVillarroel, Luis
dc.contributor.authorCaulier Cisterna, Raúl
dc.contributor.authorMiranda Hurtado, Martín Alexis
dc.contributor.authorErazo, Álvaro
dc.contributor.authorLanyon Alarcón, Glenn
dc.date.accessioned2025-04-25T15:49:51Z
dc.date.available2025-04-25T15:49:51Z
dc.date.issued2025
dc.description.abstractObjectives: The gestational weight gain chart published by Rosso and Mardones (RM) was used by the Ministry of Health in Argentina from the 1990s until 2009, when it was replaced by the Calvo et al. chart (CEA). This study compared the diagnostic capability of the RM and CEA charts for identifying mothers at risk of delivering babies with signs of intrauterine growth impairment (Birth length<50 cm, Birth weight <2500 g, Birth weight <3000 g and Birth weight >4000 g).Methods: Data from pregnant women and neonates studied in Santiago, Chile (n = 27,600), as well as a sub-sample of 11,465 term healthy singleton cases were utilized. Frequency distributions of women and their 95% confidence intervals were calculated for both charts at the first and third trimester of pregnancy. Sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values of undesirable outcomes of the RM and CEA charts were compared.Results: The CEA chart classified as either underweight or obese a smaller number of women than the RM chart. The proportion of neonates with signs of intrauterine growth impairment was similar in both charts, however the number of affected neonates was higher in the women considered to be either underweight or obese by the RM chart. Higher sensitivity values for undesirable outcomes were displayed by the RM chart. The sum of sensitivity and specificity was also higher for the RM chart, meaning a greater diagnostic accuracy; this sum was comparable only for birth weight <2500 g. The RM chart was found to have higher positive and negative predictive values for undesirable outcomes than the CEA chart.Conclusion: The RM chart has a better diagnostic capability than the CEA chart to identify mothers at risk of delivering babies with signs of intrauterine growth impairment.
dc.fechaingreso.objetodigital2025-04-25
dc.format.extent5 páginas
dc.fuente.origenORCID
dc.identifier.doi10.15406/ogij.2025.16.00786
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.15406/ogij.2025.16.00786
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositorio.uc.cl/handle/11534/103460
dc.information.autorucFacultad de Matemáticas; Villarroel Del Pino, Luis Antonio; 0000-0001-9603-937X; 77182
dc.information.autorucEscuela de Medicina; Mardones Santander, Francisco José; 0000-0002-0905-9493; 98805
dc.information.autorucEscuela de Medicina; Rosso Rosso, Pedro Pablo; S/I; 98560
dc.information.autorucEscuela de Medicina; Farías Jofré, Marcelo Enrique; 0000-0003-0473-2295; 12286
dc.information.autorucEscuela de Enfermería; Miranda Hurtado, Martín Alexis; S/I; 234328
dc.issue.numero2
dc.language.isoen
dc.nota.accesocontenido completo
dc.pagina.final45
dc.pagina.inicio41
dc.rightsacceso abierto
dc.subjectGestational weight gain
dc.subjectGrowth charts
dc.subject.ddc610
dc.subject.deweyMedicina y saludes_ES
dc.subject.ods03 Good health and well-being
dc.subject.odspa03 Salud y bienestar
dc.titleNeonatal anthropometry outcomes comparing two gestational weight gain standards
dc.typeartículo
dc.volumen4
sipa.codpersvinculados77182
sipa.codpersvinculados98805
sipa.codpersvinculados98560
sipa.codpersvinculados12286
sipa.codpersvinculados234328
sipa.trazabilidadORCID;2025-04-21
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Name:
OGIJ-16-00786.pdf
Size:
645.55 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Download
Collections
Artículos de revistas