International Skin Imaging Collaboration-Designated Diagnoses (ISIC-DX): Consensus terminology for lesion diagnostic labeling

Simple item page
dc.contributor.authorScope, Alon
dc.contributor.authorLiopyris, Konstantinos
dc.contributor.authorWeber, Jochen
dc.contributor.authorBarnhill, Raymond L.
dc.contributor.authorBraun, Ralph P.
dc.contributor.authorCuriel-Lewandrowski, Clara N.
dc.contributor.authorElder, David E.
dc.contributor.authorFerrara, Gerardo
dc.contributor.authorGrant-Kels, Jane M.
dc.contributor.authorJeunon, Thiago
dc.contributor.authorLallas, Aimilios
dc.contributor.authorLin, Jennifer Y.
dc.contributor.authorMarchetti, Michael A.
dc.contributor.authorMarghoob, Ashfaq A.
dc.contributor.authorNavarrete-Dechent, Cristian
dc.contributor.authorPellacani, Giovanni
dc.contributor.authorSoyer, Hans Peter
dc.contributor.authorStratigos, Alexander
dc.contributor.authorThomas, Luc
dc.contributor.authorKittler, Harald
dc.contributor.authorRotemberg, Veronica
dc.contributor.authorHalpern, Allan C.
dc.date.accessioned2025-01-20T16:18:51Z
dc.date.available2025-01-20T16:18:51Z
dc.date.issued2024
dc.description.abstractBackground: A common terminology for diagnosis is critically important for clinical communication, education, research and artificial intelligence. Prevailing lexicons are limited in fully representing skin neoplasms. Objectives: To achieve expert consensus on diagnostic terms for skin neoplasms and their hierarchical mapping. Methods: Diagnostic terms were extracted from textbooks, publications and extant diagnostic codes. Terms were hierarchically mapped to super-categories (e.g. 'benign') and cellular/tissue-differentiation categories (e.g. 'melanocytic'), and appended with pertinent-modifiers and synonyms. These terms were evaluated using a modified-Delphi consensus approach. Experts from the International-Skin-Imaging-Collaboration (ISIC) were surveyed on agreement with terms and their hierarchical mapping; they could suggest modifying, deleting or adding terms. Consensus threshold was >75% for the initial rounds and >50% for the final round. Results: Eighteen experts completed all Delphi rounds. Of 379 terms, 356 (94%) reached consensus in round one. Eleven of 226 (5%) benign-category terms, 6/140 (4%) malignant-category terms and 6/13 (46%) indeterminate-category terms did not reach initial agreement. Following three rounds, final consensus consisted of 362 terms mapped to 3 super-categories and 41 cellular/tissue-differentiation categories. Conclusions: We have created, agreed upon, and made public a taxonomy for skin neoplasms and their hierarchical mapping. Further study will be needed to evaluate the utility and completeness of the lexicon.
dc.description.funderIsrael Science Foundation
dc.fuente.origenWOS
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/jdv.20055
dc.identifier.eissn1468-3083
dc.identifier.issn0926-9959
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1111/jdv.20055
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositorio.uc.cl/handle/11534/90667
dc.identifier.wosidWOS:001218442700001
dc.language.isoen
dc.revistaJournal of the european academy of dermatology and venereology
dc.rightsacceso restringido
dc.subject.ods03 Good Health and Well-being
dc.subject.odspa03 Salud y bienestar
dc.titleInternational Skin Imaging Collaboration-Designated Diagnoses (ISIC-DX): Consensus terminology for lesion diagnostic labeling
dc.typeartículo
sipa.indexWOS
sipa.trazabilidadWOS;2025-01-12
Files
Collections
Artículos de revistas