Quatre Problemes Courants qui Affectent la Cour Interamericaine dans Son Avis Consultatif N° 24

dc.contributor.authorPaúl Díaz, Álvaro
dc.date.accessioned2022-11-03T16:13:27Z
dc.date.available2022-11-03T16:13:27Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.date.updated2022-09-06T18:35:57Z
dc.description.abstractThe Inter-American Court of Human Rights Advisory Opinion number 24 considers that the American Convention on Human Rights requires States to provide expedient procedures allowing for the change in legal registers, of the name and sex or gender of those who define themselves as transgender. According to this advisory opinion, States may require nothing more than the will of those who undertake this change. The Court also considers that States must allow same sex couples to have access to all legal status to which heterosexual couples can apply, including marriage. This paper broadly describes the Court's advisory opinion, and then refers to four problems that affect this pronouncement and the decision-making process of the Court in general. These are : to try to impose a unique vision on human rights ; to grant its own interpretations a higher weight than what they actually have ; to disregard its own procedural rulings, and to quote innumerable legal documents that are not legally applicable to the case at hand.
dc.description.abstractThe Inter-American Court of Human Rights Advisory Opinion number 24 considers that the American Convention on Human Rights requires States to provide expedient procedures allowing for the change in legal registers, of the name and sex or gender of those who define themselves as transgender. According to this advisory opinion, States may require nothing more than the will of those who undertake this change. The Court also considers that States must allow same sex couples to have access to all legal status to which heterosexual couples can apply, including marriage. This paper broadly describes the Court’s advisory opinion, and then refers to four problems that affect this pronouncement and the decision-making process of the Court in general. These are : to try to impose a unique vision on human rights ; to grant its own interpretations a higher weight than what they actually have; to disregard its own procedural rulings, and to quote innumerable legal documents that are not legally applicable to the case at hand.
dc.description.funderConcurso de traducción VRI 2019
dc.fuente.origenSIPA
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.academia.edu/82240519/QUATRE_PROBLEMES_COURANTS_QUI_AFFECTENT_LA_COUR_INTERAMERICAINE_DANS_SON_AVIS_CONSULTATIF_N_24
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositorio.uc.cl/handle/11534/65309
dc.information.autorucFacultad de derecho ; Paúl Díaz, Álvaro ; 0000-0003-3882-450X ; 1012898
dc.issue.numero1
dc.language.isofr
dc.nota.accesoContenido parcial
dc.pagina.final618
dc.pagina.inicio597
dc.revistaRevue de la Recherche Juridique, Droit Prospectif
dc.rightsacceso restringido
dc.subjectCour interaméricaine des droits de l’homme
dc.subjectAvis consultatif
dc.subjectInterprétation
dc.subjectPrécédents
dc.subjectLGTBI
dc.subjectGenre
dc.subject.ods05 Gender equality
dc.subject.ods16 Peace and Justice Strong Institutions
dc.subject.odspa05 Igualdad de género
dc.subject.odspa16 Paz, justicia e instituciones sólidas
dc.titleQuatre Problemes Courants qui Affectent la Cour Interamericaine dans Son Avis Consultatif N° 24
dc.typeartículo
dc.volumen187
sipa.codpersvinculados1012898
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Quatre Problemes Courants qui Affectent la Cour Interamericaine dans Son Avis Consultatif N° 24.pdf
Size:
104.92 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description: