Stratherian meditations: relations, oscillations and blind spots considering two Amerindian examples

Simple item page
dc.contributor.authorGalvezi, Marcelo Gonzalez
dc.contributor.authorDi Giminiani, Piergiorgio
dc.date.accessioned2025-01-20T16:05:19Z
dc.date.available2025-01-20T16:05:19Z
dc.date.issued2024
dc.description.abstractIn this article we illustrate the implications of the principle raised by anthropologist Marilyn Strathern in her lecture Always relating (2024), by contextualizing them in two Amerindian examples. In doing so, we highlight the importance of pursuing an introspective reflection challenging the very terms through which anthropology operates. Also, we observe how Strathern's thoughts on anthropological thinking might shed light on some unnoticed aspects of ethnographic description on Amerindian philosophies, as for the relation between object and subject.
dc.fuente.origenWOS
dc.identifier.doi10.22199/issn.0718-1043-2024-0007
dc.identifier.issn0718-1043
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.22199/issn.0718-1043-2024-0007
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositorio.uc.cl/handle/11534/89892
dc.identifier.wosidWOS:001340200600001
dc.issue.numero70
dc.language.isoen
dc.revistaEstudios atacamenos
dc.rightsacceso restringido
dc.subjectrelation
dc.subjectsocial anthropology
dc.subjectMarilyn Strathern
dc.subjectamerindian studies
dc.subjectcultural biases
dc.titleStratherian meditations: relations, oscillations and blind spots considering two Amerindian examples
dc.typeartículo
sipa.indexWOS
sipa.trazabilidadWOS;2025-01-12
Files
Collections
Artículos de revistas