Chemometric optimization of trypsin digestion method applying infrared, microwave and ultrasound energies for determination of caseins and ovalbumin in wines
dc.contributor.author | Pavon-Perez, Jessy | |
dc.contributor.author | Henriquez-Aedo, Karem | |
dc.contributor.author | Salazar, Ricardo | |
dc.contributor.author | Herrero, Miguel | |
dc.contributor.author | Aranda, Mario | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2025-01-20T23:56:09Z | |
dc.date.available | 2025-01-20T23:56:09Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2021 | |
dc.description.abstract | Caseins and ovalbumin are frequently used as wine fining agents to remove undesirable compounds like polymeric phenols. Their presence in wines is a subject of concern because may cause adverse effects on susceptible consumers, especially when their presence is not labeled. A key step for its determination is trypsin digestion, which is considered the bottleneck ofbottom-upapproach workflow because usually requires several hours. To reduce this time, the objective of this work was to carry out a chemometric optimization of trypsin digestion method applying infrared, microwave and ultrasound energies to determine caseins and ovalbumin in wines. The conditions of each accelerated digestion method were optimized using a Response Surface Methodology based on central composite design. The parameters optimized were digestion time and trypsin: protein ratio. The response variable evaluated was digestion yield, which was determined through the peak area of each protein transition determined by liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry. The most effective technique was microwave followed by ultrasound and infrared. Since optimal values of microwave and ultrasound-assisted digestion were the same, the later was chosen considering sample preparation and cost. Applying the proposed approach, a reduction ofca.140 and 240-fold on digestion time was achieved compared with optimized and non-optimized conventional methods, respectively. With this workflow, both proteins were digested in a single 3 min process allowing its detection by liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry at mu g L(-1)level, which isca.60 times lower than the current limit of 0.25 mg L-1. | |
dc.fuente.origen | WOS | |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1007/s13197-020-04793-9 | |
dc.identifier.eissn | 0975-8402 | |
dc.identifier.issn | 0022-1155 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://doi.org/10.1007/s13197-020-04793-9 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://repositorio.uc.cl/handle/11534/95135 | |
dc.identifier.wosid | WOS:000571264300002 | |
dc.issue.numero | 8 | |
dc.language.iso | en | |
dc.pagina.final | 2923 | |
dc.pagina.inicio | 2914 | |
dc.revista | Journal of food science and technology-mysore | |
dc.rights | acceso restringido | |
dc.subject | Fining agents | |
dc.subject | Mass spectrometry | |
dc.subject | Central composite design | |
dc.subject | Response surface methodology | |
dc.subject.ods | 03 Good Health and Well-being | |
dc.subject.odspa | 03 Salud y bienestar | |
dc.title | Chemometric optimization of trypsin digestion method applying infrared, microwave and ultrasound energies for determination of caseins and ovalbumin in wines | |
dc.type | artículo | |
dc.volumen | 58 | |
sipa.index | WOS | |
sipa.trazabilidad | WOS;2025-01-12 |