PANTHEISM, PANENTHEISM, AND ECOSOPHY: GETTING BACK TO SPINOZA?

dc.contributor.authorValera, Luca
dc.contributor.authorVidal, Gabriel
dc.date.accessioned2025-01-20T21:07:25Z
dc.date.available2025-01-20T21:07:25Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.description.abstractMany authors in the field of Environmental Philosophy have claimed to be inspired by Spinoza's monism, which has traditionally been considered a form of pantheism because nature and God coincide. This idea has deep normative implications, as some environmental ethicists claim that wounding nature is the same as wounding God, which implies a resacralization of nature. In particular, we will focus on Arne N AE ss's Ecosophy (or Deep Ecology) to offer a current relevant example of the pantheist (or panentheist) worldview. However, a new demarcation distinguishes pantheism from panentheism; in the latter, nature and God belong together but do not fully coincide, as in pantheism. Nevertheless, whether Spinoza is a panentheist, pantheist, or neither has yet to be fully determined, as well as whether his doctrine serves as a proper foundation for an ecology that attempts the aforementioned resacralization of nature. This article attempts to clarify these issues.
dc.fuente.origenWOS
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/zygo.12800
dc.identifier.eissn1467-9744
dc.identifier.issn0591-2385
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1111/zygo.12800
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositorio.uc.cl/handle/11534/93413
dc.identifier.wosidWOS:000797469700001
dc.issue.numero3
dc.language.isoen
dc.pagina.final563
dc.pagina.inicio545
dc.revistaZygon
dc.rightsacceso restringido
dc.subjectecosophy
dc.subjectHaeckel
dc.subjectNaess
dc.subjectpanentheism
dc.subjectpantheism
dc.subjectSpinoza
dc.subject.ods15 Life on Land
dc.subject.ods13 Climate Action
dc.subject.odspa15 Vida de ecosistemas terrestres
dc.subject.odspa13 Acción por el clima
dc.titlePANTHEISM, PANENTHEISM, AND ECOSOPHY: GETTING BACK TO SPINOZA?
dc.typeartículo
dc.volumen57
sipa.indexWOS
sipa.trazabilidadWOS;2025-01-12
Files