Kant y la condición humana
Loading...
Date
2020
Authors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Universidad Nacional de Colombia. Facultad de Ciencias Humanas
Abstract
El artículo analiza el concepto de mal radical de Kant y sostiene que su explicación del mal utiliza un modelo reconstructivo que niega la atribución de los modelos de adicción o del mal hábito. Se critica la tesis de la “revolución en la disposición moral fundamental”, primero, porque Kant abandona el método fenomenológico-trascen- dental y, segundo, por el carácter semipelagiano de su argumentación.
The article analyzes Kant’s concept of radical evil and argues that his explanation of evil uses a reconstructive model that denies the attribution of the models of addiction or bad habits. It criticizes the thesis of “revolution in fundamental moral disposition” for two reasons; first, Kant abandons the phenomenological-transcendental method, and, second, due to his arguments’ semi-Pelagian nature.
The article analyzes Kant’s concept of radical evil and argues that his explanation of evil uses a reconstructive model that denies the attribution of the models of addiction or bad habits. It criticizes the thesis of “revolution in fundamental moral disposition” for two reasons; first, Kant abandons the phenomenological-transcendental method, and, second, due to his arguments’ semi-Pelagian nature.
Description
Keywords
Kant, Mal radical, Semi-pelagianismo, Moral, Morality, Radical evil, Semi-Pelagianism