Outcomes mapping study for childhood vaccination communication: too few concepts were measured in too many ways

Simple item page
dc.contributor.authorKaufman, Jessica
dc.contributor.authorRyan, Rebecca
dc.contributor.authorBosch-Capblanch, Xavier
dc.contributor.authorCartier, Yuri
dc.contributor.authorCliff, Julie
dc.contributor.authorGlenton, Claire
dc.contributor.authorLewin, Simon
dc.contributor.authorRada, Gabriel
dc.contributor.authorAmes, Heather
dc.contributor.authorMuloliwa, Artur Manuel
dc.contributor.authorOku, Afiong
dc.contributor.authorOyo-Ita, Angela
dc.contributor.authorHill, Sophie
dc.date.accessioned2025-01-23T21:31:44Z
dc.date.available2025-01-23T21:31:44Z
dc.date.issued2016
dc.description.abstractObjectives: The objectives of this article are to (1) comprehensively catalog outcomes measured in trials of childhood vaccination communication interventions and (2) analyze patterns and trends in outcome selection. To achieve these objectives, we developed a Trial Outcomes Map for vaccination communication.
dc.description.abstractStudy design: We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials for trials of childhood vaccination communication interventions, extracting verbatim all outcome information from included trials. Through thematic grouping, we categorized outcomes based on conceptual similarities, forming a Trial Outcomes Map.
dc.description.abstractResults: We identified 112 relevant trials containing 209 outcomes. Thematic analysis revealed three overarching Outcome Categories: consumer-, vaccination-, and health system-related outcomes. These categories contain 21 Outcome Types (eg, "knowledge," "cost"), measured using 66 different Outcome Variables. Vaccination outcomes were measured most frequently and health system-related outcomes least frequently. Consumer outcomes are increasingly measured in more recent trials.
dc.description.abstractConclusion: The number of measures used for the same outcomes complicates data synthesis and interpretation. Despite recent trends toward including consumer outcomes, intermediate outcome measurement is lacking, hampering understanding of how and why vaccination communication interventions do or do not work. This Map may improve outcome consistency in future trials and will contribute to a forthcoming core outcome set. (C) 2016 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc.
dc.fuente.origenWOS
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.jclinepi.2015.10.003
dc.identifier.eissn1878-5921
dc.identifier.issn0895-4356
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2015.10.003
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositorio.uc.cl/handle/11534/101475
dc.identifier.wosidWOS:000372393300007
dc.language.isoen
dc.pagina.final44
dc.pagina.inicio33
dc.revistaJournal of clinical epidemiology
dc.rightsacceso restringido
dc.subjectOutcome
dc.subjectCore outcome set
dc.subjectVaccination
dc.subjectCommunication
dc.subjectOutcomes map
dc.subjectOutcome categorisation
dc.subjectMethodology
dc.titleOutcomes mapping study for childhood vaccination communication: too few concepts were measured in too many ways
dc.typeartículo
dc.volumen72
sipa.indexWOS
sipa.trazabilidadWOS;2025-01-12
Files
Collections
Artículos de revistas