Experimental Assessment of Residual Seismic Capacity of Unconfined Slender Reinforced Concrete Walls after Constant Drift Loading Protocols

dc.catalogadordfo
dc.contributor.authorColmenares Ramos, Juan José
dc.contributor.authorSanta María, H.
dc.contributor.authorHube Ginestar, Matías Andrés
dc.date.accessioned2025-07-15T20:58:23Z
dc.date.available2025-07-15T20:58:23Z
dc.date.issued2025
dc.description.abstractExperimental evaluation of the residual seismic capacity of unconfined slender reinforced concrete (RC) walls is essential for making informed decisions after earthquakes, particularly in seismic-prone regions like Chile. This study addresses the gap in experimental data regarding the impact of constant drift loading cycles on the residual seismic capacity of such walls. The residual seismic capacity of walls is understood as the ability to withstand future seismic demands after prior damage, considering potential changes in stiffness, strength, deformation capacity, and energy dissipation. This capacity is essential for understanding wall behavior during successive or long-duration seismic events. Through an experimental program, four full-scale wall specimens were subjected to lateral loading cycles under constant axial load to simulate pre-earthquake minor damage. A comprehensive instrumentation scheme, combined with digital image correlation techniques, was employed to record deformations and loads throughout the entire testing process. Findings illustrate notable stiffness variations attributed to pre-earthquake damage, pinpointing deformation levels reached as the primary cause, rather than the repetitive nature of the loading cycles. Contrarily, the strength, deformation capacity, and energy dissipation capacity attributes of the walls remained unchanged. These results provide valuable insights into the residual seismic capacity of reinforced concrete walls: loading cycles at a drift of ~0.86% (minor damage) did not significantly affect wall strength, deformation capacity, stiffness, or energy dissipation capacity. This study also contributes to existing literature with relevant empirical evidence, suggesting reconsideration of FEMA 306 stiffness reduction factors.
dc.fuente.origenORCID
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.jobe.2025.113351
dc.identifier.issn2352-7102
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2025.113351
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositorio.uc.cl/handle/11534/104936
dc.information.autorucEscuela de Ingeniería; Santa Maria Oyanedel, Hernan; 0000-0003-3176-7821; 76135
dc.information.autorucEscuela de Ingeniería; Colmenares Ramos Juan Jose; S/I; 1080941
dc.information.autorucEscuela de Ingeniería; Hube Ginestar Matias Andres; 0000-0003-0371-9048; 10832
dc.issue.numero111
dc.language.isoen
dc.nota.accesocontenido parcial
dc.revistaJournal of Building Engineering
dc.rightsacceso restringido
dc.subject.ddc620
dc.subject.deweyIngenieríaes_ES
dc.subject.ods09 Industry, innovation and infrastructure
dc.subject.odspa09 Industria, innovación e infraestructura
dc.titleExperimental Assessment of Residual Seismic Capacity of Unconfined Slender Reinforced Concrete Walls after Constant Drift Loading Protocols
dc.typeartículo
sipa.codpersvinculados76135
sipa.codpersvinculados1080941
sipa.codpersvinculados10832
sipa.trazabilidadORCID;2025-07-07
Files