Insights on fostering the emergence of robust conservation actions from Zimbabwe's CAMPFIRE program

dc.contributor.authorBiggs, Duan
dc.contributor.authorBan, Natalie C.
dc.contributor.authorCastilla, Juan Carlos
dc.contributor.authorGelcich, Stefan
dc.contributor.authorMills, Morena
dc.contributor.authorGandiwa, Edson
dc.contributor.authorEtienne, Michel
dc.contributor.authorKnight, Andrew T.
dc.contributor.authorMarquet, Pablo A.
dc.contributor.authorPossingham, Hugh P.
dc.date.accessioned2025-01-23T21:14:23Z
dc.date.available2025-01-23T21:14:23Z
dc.date.issued2019
dc.description.abstractOne strategy to address threats to biodiversity in the face of ongoing budget constraints is to create an enabling environment that facilitates individuals, communities and other groups to self-organise to achieve conservation outcomes. Emergence (new activities and initiatives), and robustness (durability of these activities and initiatives over time), two related concepts from the common pool resources literature, provide guidance on how to support and enable such self-organised action for conservation. To date emergence has received little attention in the literature. Our exploratory synthesis of the conditions for emergence from the literature highlighted four themes: for conservation to emerge, actors need to 1) recognise the need for change, 2) expect positive outcomes, 3) be able to experiment to achieve collective learning, and 4) have legitimate local scale governance authority. Insights from the literature on emergence and robustness suggest that an appropriate balance should be maintained between external guidance of conservation and enabling local actors to find solutions appropriate to their contexts. We illustrate the conditions for emergence, and its interaction with robustness, through discussing the Communal Areas Management Programme for Indigenous Resources (CAMPFIRE) in Zimbabwe and reflect on efforts at strengthening local autonomy and management around the world. We suggest that the delicate balance between external guidance of actions, and supporting local actors to develop their own solutions, should be managed adaptively over time to support the emergence of robust conservation actions. (C) 2019 Published by Elsevier B.V.
dc.fuente.origenWOS
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.gecco.2019.e00538
dc.identifier.issn2351-9894
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.gecco.2019.e00538
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositorio.uc.cl/handle/11534/101036
dc.identifier.wosidWOS:000465448800045
dc.language.isoen
dc.revistaGlobal ecology and conservation
dc.rightsacceso restringido
dc.subjectEmergence
dc.subjectRobustness
dc.subjectComplexity
dc.subjectCost-effectiveness
dc.subjectInstitutions
dc.subjectSocial learning
dc.subjectCommunity-based conservation
dc.subjectCAMPFIRE
dc.subject.ods13 Climate Action
dc.subject.ods15 Life on Land
dc.subject.ods01 No Poverty
dc.subject.ods02 Zero Hunger
dc.subject.odspa13 Acción por el clima
dc.subject.odspa15 Vida de ecosistemas terrestres
dc.subject.odspa01 Fin de la pobreza
dc.subject.odspa02 Hambre cero
dc.titleInsights on fostering the emergence of robust conservation actions from Zimbabwe's CAMPFIRE program
dc.typeartículo
dc.volumen17
sipa.indexWOS
sipa.trazabilidadWOS;2025-01-12
Files