Trade-off between plant resistance and tolerance to herbivory: Mechanical defenses outweigh chemical defenses

Simple item page
dc.contributor.authorSalgado-Luarte, Cristian
dc.contributor.authorGonzalez-Teuber, Marcia
dc.contributor.authorMadriaza, Karina
dc.contributor.authorGianoli, Ernesto
dc.date.accessioned2025-01-20T20:20:27Z
dc.date.available2025-01-20T20:20:27Z
dc.date.issued2023
dc.description.abstractPlant resistance includes mechanical and chemical defenses that reduce herbivory, whereas plant tolerance reduces the fitness impact of herbivory. Because defenses are costly and investing in both resistance and tolerance may be superfluous, trade-offs among them are expected. In forest ecosystems, the mechanical strengthening of leaves is linked both to shade adaptation and antiherbivore defenses, but it also compromises resource uptake, therefore limiting regrowth following damage, suggesting a trade-off between mechanical defenses and tolerance. We tested for the resistance-tolerance trade-off across 11 common tree species in a temperate rainforest and explored mechanistic explanations by measuring chemical and mechanical defenses. Herbivory damage was negatively associated with leaf toughness and fiber content, whereas there was no significant relationship between herbivory and secondary metabolites (flavonols, gallic acid, tannins, and terpenoids). We detected a resistance-tolerance trade-off, as expected. We found a negative relationship between mechanical defenses and tolerance, estimated as the survival ratio between experimentally damaged and undamaged seedlings. Tolerance and secondary metabolites showed no significant association. Results suggest that selective forces other than herbivory acting on defensive traits can favor a resistance-tolerance trade-off. Therefore, plant adaptation to contrasting light environments may contribute to the evolution of resistance-tolerance trade-offs.
dc.description.funderFondo Nacional de Desarrollo Cientifico y Tecnologico
dc.fuente.origenWOS
dc.identifier.doi10.1002/ecy.3860
dc.identifier.eissn1939-9170
dc.identifier.issn0012-9658
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1002/ecy.3860
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositorio.uc.cl/handle/11534/92579
dc.identifier.wosidWOS:000880735300001
dc.issue.numero1
dc.language.isoen
dc.revistaEcology
dc.rightsacceso restringido
dc.subjectforest
dc.subjectherbivory
dc.subjectmechanical defenses
dc.subjectresistance
dc.subjecttolerance
dc.subjecttrade-off
dc.subject.ods02 Zero Hunger
dc.subject.ods15 Life on Land
dc.subject.ods13 Climate Action
dc.subject.odspa02 Hambre cero
dc.subject.odspa15 Vida de ecosistemas terrestres
dc.subject.odspa13 Acción por el clima
dc.titleTrade-off between plant resistance and tolerance to herbivory: Mechanical defenses outweigh chemical defenses
dc.typeartículo
dc.volumen104
sipa.indexWOS
sipa.trazabilidadWOS;2025-01-12
Files
Collections
Artículos de revistas