A microanalytical look at mutual regulation in psychotherapeutic dialogue: Dialogic discourse analysis (DDA) in episodes of rupture of the alliance

dc.contributor.authorMartínez Guzman, C.
dc.contributor.authorTomicic, A.
dc.contributor.authorMedina, L.
dc.contributor.authorKrause, Mariane
dc.date.accessioned2024-06-01T08:00:17Z
dc.date.available2024-06-01T08:00:17Z
dc.date.issued2014
dc.description.abstract© 2013 Italian Area Group of the Society for Psychotherapy Research.The psychotherapeutic process, like any intimate relationship between two human beings, involves mutual self-regulation processes that support effective communication. In psychotherapy, such regulatory processes are necessary to maintaining a positive working alliance and also contribute to therapeutic change. Episodes in which the alliance is ruptured or these ruptures are resolved constitute key moments during which the aforementioned regulatory processes are manifested. This article outlines a micro-analysis of these rupture episodes, using dialogic discourse analysis (DDA) to depict mutual regulation processes in the psychotherapeutic dialogue. DDA is a microanalytic procedure that makes it possible to identify discursive strategies associated with the processes of the construction, failure, and restoration of the psychotherapeutic dialogue. This analytic tool was applied to 34 rupture episodes identified in long-term psychoanalytic therapy. Following this, an emergent model about the discursive regulatory features in episodes of alliance rupture was developed, distinguishing between the overcoming and repairing processes of the alliance ruptures. The core issue for the resolution of ruptures seems to be the ability to regulate the tension between the participants. In this paper, we discuss the processes of repairing and overcoming of the rupture as two alternatives methods for regulating this tension. It is proposed that strategies that are most similar to repairing are more likely to facilitate the occurrence of psychotherapeutic change. Additionally, the discussion focuses on the value of DDA as a microanalytical methodology that makes it possible to comprehensively account for these processes.
dc.description.funderNational Doctoral Scholarship of the National Agency for Research and Development (ANID), Chile
dc.fechaingreso.objetodigital2025-10-19
dc.format.extent20 páginas
dc.fuente.origenScopus
dc.identifier.doi10.4081/ripppo.2014.153
dc.identifier.eisbn978-84-617-5895-1
dc.identifier.eissn07180705
dc.identifier.issn22398031
dc.identifier.scopusidSCOPUS_ID:84927641216
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.4081/ripppo.2014.153
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositorio.uc.cl/handle/11534/86370
dc.identifier.wosidWOS:001162175200006
dc.issue.numero2
dc.language.isoen
dc.nota.accesocontenido completo
dc.pagina.final92
dc.pagina.inicio73
dc.revistaResearch in Psychotherapy: Psychopathology, Process and Outcome
dc.rightsacceso abierto
dc.subjectDialogic discourse analysis
dc.subjectMutual regulation in psychotherapy
dc.subjectRuptures of the therapeutic alliance
dc.titleA microanalytical look at mutual regulation in psychotherapeutic dialogue: Dialogic discourse analysis (DDA) in episodes of rupture of the alliance
dc.typeartículo
dc.volumen17
sipa.codpersvinculados58559
sipa.indexScopus
sipa.trazabilidadCarga WOS-SCOPUS;01-06-2024
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
A microanalytical look at mutual regulation in psychotherapeutic dialogue.pdf
Size:
748.88 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description: