Disrupting Racism and Global Exclusion in Academic Publishing: Recommendations and Resources for Authors, Reviewers, and Editors

dc.contributor.authorLedgerwood, Alison
dc.contributor.authorLawson, Katherine M.
dc.contributor.authorKraus, Michael W.
dc.contributor.authorVollhardt, Johanna Ray
dc.contributor.authorRemedios, Jessica D.
dc.contributor.authorWestberg, Dulce Wilkinson
dc.contributor.authorUskul, Ayse K.
dc.contributor.authorAdetula, Adeyemi
dc.contributor.authorLeach, Colin Wayne
dc.contributor.authorMartinez, Joel E.
dc.contributor.authorNaumann, Laura P.
dc.contributor.authorReddy, Geetha
dc.contributor.authorTate, Charlotte Chucky
dc.contributor.authorTodd, Andrew R.
dc.contributor.authorWeltzien, Katherine
dc.contributor.authorBuchanan, Nicole
dc.contributor.authorGonzalez, Roberto
dc.contributor.authorDoble, L. James Montilla
dc.contributor.authorRomero-Canyas, Rainer
dc.contributor.authorWestgate, Erin
dc.contributor.authorZou, Linda X.
dc.date.accessioned2025-01-20T16:09:35Z
dc.date.available2025-01-20T16:09:35Z
dc.date.issued2024
dc.description.abstractScholars have been working through multiple avenues to address longstanding and entrenched patterns of global and racial exclusion in psychology and academia more generally. As part of the Society for Personality and Social Psychology's efforts to enhance inclusive excellence in its journals, the Anti Colorism/Eurocentrism in Methods and Practices (ACEMAP) task force worked to develop recommendations and resources to counteract racism and global exclusion in standard publication practices. In this paper, the task force describes a structure and process we developed for conducting committee work that centers marginalized perspectives while mitigating cultural taxation. We then describe our recommendations and openly accessible resources (e.g., resources for inclusive reviewing practices, writing about constraints on generalizability, drafting a globally inclusive demographic information survey, inclusive citation practices, and improving representation among editorial gatekeeping positions; recommendations and resource links are provided in Table 3). These recommendations and resources are both (a) tailored for a particular set of journals at a particular time and (b) useful as a foundation that can be continually adapted and improved for other journals and going forward. This paper provides concrete plans for readers looking to enhance inclusive excellence in their committee work, authorship, reviewing, and/or editing.
dc.fuente.origenWOS
dc.identifier.doi10.1525/collabra.121394
dc.identifier.issn2474-7394
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1525/collabra.121394
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositorio.uc.cl/handle/11534/90159
dc.identifier.wosidWOS:001304312300001
dc.issue.numero1
dc.language.isoen
dc.revistaCollabra-psychology
dc.rightsacceso restringido
dc.subjectdiversity
dc.subjectinclusion
dc.subjectracism
dc.subjectstructural inequality
dc.subjectconstraints on generality
dc.subjectcitational justice
dc.subjectpeer review
dc.subjectopen science
dc.titleDisrupting Racism and Global Exclusion in Academic Publishing: Recommendations and Resources for Authors, Reviewers, and Editors
dc.typeartículo
dc.volumen10
sipa.indexWOS
sipa.trazabilidadWOS;2025-01-12
Files