Costs and effectiveness of alternative dog vaccination strategies to improve dog population coverage in rural and urban settings during a rabies outbreak
dc.contributor.author | Undurraga, Eduardo A. | |
dc.contributor.author | Millien, Max F. | |
dc.contributor.author | Allel, Kasim | |
dc.contributor.author | Etheart, Melissa D. | |
dc.contributor.author | Cleaton, Julie | |
dc.contributor.author | Ross, Yasmeen | |
dc.contributor.author | Wallace, Ryan M. | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2025-01-23T19:49:00Z | |
dc.date.available | 2025-01-23T19:49:00Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2020 | |
dc.description.abstract | Dog-rabies elimination programs have typically relied upon parenteral vaccination at central-point loca-tions; however, dog-ownership practices, accessibility to hard-to-reach sub-populations, resource limita-tions, and logistics may impact a country's ability to reach the 70% coverage goal recommended by the World Organization for Animal Health (OIE) and World Health Organization (WHO). Here we report the cost-effectiveness of different dog-vaccination strategies during a dog-rabies outbreak in urban and peri- urban sections of Croix-des-Bouquets commune of the West Department, Haiti, in 2016. Three strategies, mobile static point (MSP), mobile static point with capture-vaccinate-release (MSP + CVR), and door-to-door vaccination with oral vaccination (DDV + ORV), were applied at five randomly assigned sites and assessed for free-roaming dog vaccination coverage and total population coverage. A total of 7065 dogs were vaccinated against rabies during the vaccination campaign. Overall, free-roaming dog vaccination coverage was estimated at 52% (47%-56%) for MSP, 53% (47%-60%) for DDV + ORV, and 65% (61%-69%) for MSP + CVR (differences with MSP and DDV + ORV significant at p < 0.01). Total dog vaccination cover-age was 33% (95% CI: 26%-43%) for MSP, 49% (95% CI: 40%-61%) for MSP + CVR and 78% (77%-80%) for DDV + ORV (differences significant at p < 0.001). Overall, the least expensive campaign was MSP, with an esti-mated cost of about $2039 per day ($4078 total), and the most expensive was DDV + ORV with a cost of $3246 per day ($6492 total). Despite the relative high cost of an ORV bait, combining DDV and ORV was the most cost-effective strategy in our study ($1.97 per vaccinated dog), largely due to increased efficiency of the vaccinators to target less accessible dogs. Costs per vaccinated dog were $2.20 for MSP and $2.28 for MSP + CVR. We hope the results from this study will support the design and implementation of effective dog vaccination campaigns to achieve the goal of eliminating dog-mediated human rabies deaths by 2030. (c) 2020 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd. | |
dc.description.funder | CDC country office in Haiti | |
dc.fuente.origen | WOS | |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1016/j.vaccine.2020.06.006 | |
dc.identifier.eissn | 1873-2518 | |
dc.identifier.issn | 0264-410X | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2020.06.006 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://repositorio.uc.cl/handle/11534/100474 | |
dc.identifier.wosid | WOS:000564260700012 | |
dc.issue.numero | 39 | |
dc.language.iso | en | |
dc.pagina.final | 6173 | |
dc.pagina.inicio | 6162 | |
dc.revista | Vaccine | |
dc.rights | acceso restringido | |
dc.subject | Health economics | |
dc.subject | Infectious disease | |
dc.subject | Rabies | |
dc.subject | Vaccination | |
dc.subject | Zoonotic diseases | |
dc.subject | One health | |
dc.subject | Global health | |
dc.subject.ods | 03 Good Health and Well-being | |
dc.subject.odspa | 03 Salud y bienestar | |
dc.title | Costs and effectiveness of alternative dog vaccination strategies to improve dog population coverage in rural and urban settings during a rabies outbreak | |
dc.type | artículo | |
dc.volumen | 38 | |
sipa.index | WOS | |
sipa.trazabilidad | WOS;2025-01-12 |