Consistency of data reporting in fluid responsiveness studies in the critically ill setting: the CODEFIRE consensus from the Cardiovascular Dynamic section of the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine

Simple item page
dc.contributor.authorMessina, Antonio
dc.contributor.authorChew, Michelle S.
dc.contributor.authorPoole, Daniele
dc.contributor.authorCalabro, Lorenzo
dc.contributor.authorDe Backer, Daniel
dc.contributor.authorDonadello, Katia
dc.contributor.authorHernandez, Glenn
dc.contributor.authorHamzaoui, Olfa
dc.contributor.authorJozwiak, Mathieu
dc.contributor.authorLai, Christopher
dc.contributor.authorMalbrain, Manu L. N. G.
dc.contributor.authorMallat, Jihad
dc.contributor.authorMyatra, Sheyla Nainan
dc.contributor.authorMuller, Laurent
dc.contributor.authorOspina-Tascon, Gustavo
dc.contributor.authorPinsky, Michael R.
dc.contributor.authorPreau, Sebastian
dc.contributor.authorSaugel, Bernd
dc.contributor.authorTeboul, Jean-Louis
dc.contributor.authorCecconi, Maurizio
dc.contributor.authorMonnet, Xavier
dc.date.accessioned2025-01-20T17:08:09Z
dc.date.available2025-01-20T17:08:09Z
dc.date.issued2024
dc.description.abstractPurposeTo provide consensus recommendations regarding hemodynamic data reporting in studies investigating fluid responsiveness and fluid challenge (FC) use in the intensive care unit (ICU).MethodsThe Executive Committee of the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine (ESICM) commissioned and supervised the project. A panel of 18 international experts and a methodologist identified main domains and items from a systematic literature, plus 2 ancillary domains. A three-step Delphi process based on an iterative approach was used to obtain the final consensus. In the Delphi 1 and 2, the items were selected with strong (>= 80% of votes) or week agreement (70-80% of votes), while the Delphi 3 generated recommended (>= 90% of votes) or suggested (80-90% of votes) items (RI and SI, respectively).ResultsWe identified 5 main domains initially including 117 items and the consensus finally resulted in 52 recommendations or suggestions: 18 RIs and 2 SIs statements were obtained for the domain "ICU admission", 11 RIs and 1 SI for the domain "mechanical ventilation", 5 RIs for the domain "reason for giving a FC", 8 RIs for the domain pre- and post-FC "hemodynamic data", and 7 RIs for the domain "pre-FC infused drugs". We had no consensus on the use of echocardiography, strong agreement regarding the volume (4 ml/kg) and the reference variable (cardiac output), while weak on administration rate (within 10 min) of FC in this setting.ConclusionThis consensus found 5 main domains and provided 52 recommendations for data reporting in studies investigating fluid responsiveness in ICU patients.
dc.fuente.origenWOS
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s00134-024-07344-4
dc.identifier.eissn1432-1238
dc.identifier.issn0342-4642
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-024-07344-4
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositorio.uc.cl/handle/11534/90921
dc.identifier.wosidWOS:001184375200002
dc.issue.numero4
dc.language.isoen
dc.pagina.final560
dc.pagina.inicio548
dc.revistaIntensive care medicine
dc.rightsacceso restringido
dc.subjectFluid therapy
dc.subjectFluid challenge
dc.subjectFluid responsiveness
dc.subjectHemodynamic monitoring
dc.subjectESICM consensus
dc.subject.ods03 Good Health and Well-being
dc.subject.odspa03 Salud y bienestar
dc.titleConsistency of data reporting in fluid responsiveness studies in the critically ill setting: the CODEFIRE consensus from the Cardiovascular Dynamic section of the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine
dc.typeartículo
dc.volumen50
sipa.indexWOS
sipa.trazabilidadWOS;2025-01-12
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Consistency of data reporting in fuid.pdf
Size:
2.63 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Download
Collections
Artículos de revistas