Has the New Natalism Reduced the Religious Fertility Advantage?

Simple item page
dc.contributor.authorDeRose, Laurie F.
dc.contributor.authorWilcox, William Bradford
dc.contributor.authorLeyva-Townsend, Pamela
dc.contributor.authorReyes Brito, Javiera
dc.contributor.authorJames, Spencer
dc.date.accessioned2025-01-20T22:11:34Z
dc.date.available2025-01-20T22:11:34Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.description.abstractReligion has historically been a pronatalist force, but because it fosters traditional gender role attitudes, its importance for fertility has the potential to wane if gender equality is emerging as the new natalism. We used World Values Survey (WVS) data from 1989 to 2020 to determine whether the religious fertility advantage has changed over the last three decades, with a particular focus on low-fertility countries where egalitarian gender role attitudes are most likely to support childbearing. The fertility advantage associated with holding traditional gender role attitudes has indeed decreased over time, but this had at best a minimal effect on the religious fertility advantage.
dc.fuente.origenWOS
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/jssr.12747
dc.identifier.eissn1468-5906
dc.identifier.issn0021-8294
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1111/jssr.12747
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositorio.uc.cl/handle/11534/94409
dc.identifier.wosidWOS:000682742000001
dc.language.isoen
dc.revistaJournal for the scientific study of religion
dc.rightsacceso restringido
dc.subjectfertility
dc.subjectgender equity
dc.subjectreligious salience
dc.subjectreligiosity
dc.subjectsecularization
dc.subject.ods03 Good Health and Well-being
dc.subject.ods05 Gender Equality
dc.subject.odspa03 Salud y bienestar
dc.subject.odspa05 Igualdad de género
dc.titleHas the New Natalism Reduced the Religious Fertility Advantage?
dc.typeartículo
sipa.indexWOS
sipa.trazabilidadWOS;2025-01-12
Files
Collections
Artículos de revistas