Statistics for Influence of Isolation Method of the Operative Field on Gingival Damage, Patients' Preference, and Restoration Retention in Noncarious Cervical Lesions
Total visits
| views | |
|---|---|
| Influence of Isolation Method of the Operative Field on Gingival Damage, Patients' Preference, and Restoration Retention in Noncarious Cervical Lesions | 56 |
Total visits per month
| views | |
|---|---|
| October 2024 | 0 |
| November 2024 | 0 |
| December 2024 | 0 |
| January 2025 | 0 |
| February 2025 | 0 |
| March 2025 | 0 |
| April 2025 | 0 |
File Visits
| views | |
|---|---|
| Influence of Isolation Method of the Operative Field on Gingival Damage, Patients' Preference, and Restoration Retention in Noncarious Cervical Lesions.pdf | 5 |
| Influence of Isolation Method of the Operative Field on Gingival Damage, Patients' Preference, and Restoration Retention in Noncarious Cervical Lesions.pdf | 3 |
| Influence of Isolation Method of the Operative Field on Gingival Damage, Patients' Preference, and Restoration Retention in Noncarious Cervical Lesions.pdf | 2 |
Top country views
| views | |
|---|---|
| United States | 42 |
| Chile | 10 |
| Lebanon | 2 |
| Mexico | 1 |
| Sweden | 1 |
Top city views
| views | |
|---|---|
| Miami | 36 |
| Santiago | 10 |
| Alameda | 2 |
| Chicago | 2 |
| Campbell | 1 |
| Sacramento | 1 |
| Zapopan | 1 |
| Åkersberga | 1 |