Browsing by Author "Weber, Jochen"
Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
Results Per Page
Sort Options
- ItemExpert Agreement on the Presence and Spatial Localization of Melanocytic Features in Dermoscopy(2024) Liopyris, Konstantinos; Navarrete-Dechent, Cristian; Marchetti, Michael A.; Rotemberg, Veronica; Apalla, Zoe; Argenziano, Giuseppe; Blum, Andreas; Braun, Ralph P.; Carrera, Cristina; Codella, Noel C. F.; Combalia, Marc; Dusza, Stephen W.; Gutman, David A.; Helba, Brian; Hofmann-Wellenhof, Rainer; Jaimes, Natalia; Kittler, Harald; Kose, Kivanc; Lallas, Aimilios; Longo, Caterina; Malvehy, Josep; Menzies, Scott; Nelson, Kelly C.; Paoli, John; Puig, Susana; Rabinovitz, Harold S.; Rishpon, Ayelet; Russo, Teresa; Scope, Alon; Soyer, H. Peter; Stein, Jennifer A.; Stolz, Willhelm; Sgouros, Dimitrios; Stratigos, Alexander J.; Swanson, David L.; Thomas, Luc; Tschandl, Philipp; Zalaudek, Iris; Weber, Jochen; Halpern, Allan C.; Marghoob, Ashfaq A.Dermoscopy aids in melanoma detection; however, agreement on dermoscopic features, including those of high clinical relevance, remains poor. In this study, we attempted to evaluate agreement among experts on exemplar images not only for the presence of melanocytic-specific features but also for spatial localization. This was a cross-sectional, multicenter, observational study. Dermoscopy images exhibiting at least 1 of 31 melanocytic-specific features were submitted by 25 world experts as exemplars. Using a web-based platform that allows for image markup of specific contrast-defined regions (superpixels), 20 expert readers annotated 248 dermoscopic images in collections of 62 images. Each collection was reviewed by five independent readers. A total of 4,507 feature observations were performed. Good-to-excellent agreement was found for 14 of 31 features (45.2%), with eight achieving excellent agreement (Gwet's AC >0.75) and seven of them being melanomaspecific features. These features were peppering/granularity (0.91), shiny white streaks (0.89), typical pigment network (0.83), blotch irregular (0.82), negative network (0.81), irregular globules (0.78), dotted vessels (0.77), and blue-whitish veil (0.76). By utilizing an exemplar dataset, a good-to-excellent agreement was found for 14 features that have previously been shown useful in discriminating nevi from melanoma. All images are public (www.isic-archive.com) and can be used for education, scientific communication, and machine learning experiments.
- ItemInternational Skin Imaging Collaboration-Designated Diagnoses (ISIC-DX): Consensus terminology for lesion diagnostic labeling(2024) Scope, Alon; Liopyris, Konstantinos; Weber, Jochen; Barnhill, Raymond L.; Braun, Ralph P.; Curiel-Lewandrowski, Clara N.; Elder, David E.; Ferrara, Gerardo; Grant-Kels, Jane M.; Jeunon, Thiago; Lallas, Aimilios; Lin, Jennifer Y.; Marchetti, Michael A.; Marghoob, Ashfaq A.; Navarrete-Dechent, Cristian; Pellacani, Giovanni; Soyer, Hans Peter; Stratigos, Alexander; Thomas, Luc; Kittler, Harald; Rotemberg, Veronica; Halpern, Allan C.Background: A common terminology for diagnosis is critically important for clinical communication, education, research and artificial intelligence. Prevailing lexicons are limited in fully representing skin neoplasms. Objectives: To achieve expert consensus on diagnostic terms for skin neoplasms and their hierarchical mapping. Methods: Diagnostic terms were extracted from textbooks, publications and extant diagnostic codes. Terms were hierarchically mapped to super-categories (e.g. 'benign') and cellular/tissue-differentiation categories (e.g. 'melanocytic'), and appended with pertinent-modifiers and synonyms. These terms were evaluated using a modified-Delphi consensus approach. Experts from the International-Skin-Imaging-Collaboration (ISIC) were surveyed on agreement with terms and their hierarchical mapping; they could suggest modifying, deleting or adding terms. Consensus threshold was >75% for the initial rounds and >50% for the final round. Results: Eighteen experts completed all Delphi rounds. Of 379 terms, 356 (94%) reached consensus in round one. Eleven of 226 (5%) benign-category terms, 6/140 (4%) malignant-category terms and 6/13 (46%) indeterminate-category terms did not reach initial agreement. Following three rounds, final consensus consisted of 362 terms mapped to 3 super-categories and 41 cellular/tissue-differentiation categories. Conclusions: We have created, agreed upon, and made public a taxonomy for skin neoplasms and their hierarchical mapping. Further study will be needed to evaluate the utility and completeness of the lexicon.