Browsing by Author "Véliz, Claudia P."

Now showing 1 - 13 of 13
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Adaptation, psychometric properties and implementation of the Mini-CEX in dental clerkship
    (2020) Véliz, Claudia P.; Fuentes Cimma, Javiera Carolina; Fuentes López, Eduardo; Riquelme Pérez, Arnoldo; Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile. Escuela de Medicina
    Background: Workplace-based assessment is a key component of dental students during their clerkship in order to demonstrate clinical proficiency. Purpose: This study aims to analyze the results obtained from adapting the Mini-Clinical Evaluation Exercise (Mini-CEX) to the clerkship of a dentistry program, and to examine its psychometric properties. Methods: First, a Delphi panel method was used to ensure content validity. Then, the Mini-CEX was piloted in the dental clerkship where each student was assessed by at least two supervisors and a peer student; the psychometric properties, acceptability, and observation-time were analyzed afterward. Results: The pilot study was conducted between July and November of 2019. One hundred forty Mini-CEX were carried out on 30 students, eighty-four by supervisors and fifty-six by peers. The adapted instrument was proved to be unidimensional, obtaining an acceptable internal consistency (α=0.74). There was a difference in observation-time as the type of assessor changed; the medians (Q1-Q3) were 10 minutes (5-15) for supervisors and 30 minutes (20-45) for peer students (p<0.001). This difference was also observed when analyzing the assessor’s satisfaction (p<0.001) since the supervisor scored a median of 6 (6-6.75), and peer students scored a median of 7 (6-7). No differences were found between the scores given by supervisors and peers. Conclusion: The adapted version of the Mini-CEX can objectively assess students' clinical performance of dental student based on values of validity and reliability, which are similar to those obtained in the original instrument.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Adaptation, psychometric properties, and implementation of the mini-CEX in dental clerkship
    (2021) Véliz, Claudia P.; Fuentes Cimma, Javiera Carolina; Fuentes López, Eduardo; Riquelme Pérez, Arnoldo
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Análisis descriptivo del concurso de ingreso al ciclo de destinación y formación de cirujanos dentistas entre los años 2009 y 2018
    (2021) Véliz, Claudia P.; Moscoso-Matus, Karla; GarcÍa-Huidobro Kirberg, Rosario Isabel; Cantarutti Martínez, Cynthia; Guzmán Ángel, Daniela; Vargas, Juan Pablo
  • No Thumbnail Available
    Item
    Case‐based learning to teach scientific thinking to dental students
    (2022) Aguayo Paul, Sebastián; Benso, Bruna; Cantarutti Martínez, Cynthia; Ortuño Borroto, Duniel; Véliz, Claudia P.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    ¿Cuáles son las barreras de acceso a la atención odontológica de las mujeres embarazadas? Una revisión de la literatura
    (2017) Cantarutti Martínez, Cynthia; Véliz, Claudia P.; Pardo, Andrea; Ortúzar, I.; Jordan, V.; Moneva, M.; Madariaga, P.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Dental recommendations in the COVID-19 pandemic: A narrative review
    (2020) Vargas-Buratovic, Juan Pablo; Verdugo-Paiva, Francisca; Véliz, Claudia P.; López-Tagle, Elizabeht; Ahumada-Salinas, Alexis; Ortuño Borroto, Duniel
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Desafíos de la educación en odontología
    (Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, 2022) Isbej Esposito, Lorena Pilar; Cantarutti Martínez, Cynthia; Carrasco Labra, Alonso; Hassi Thumala, José Carlos; Garcia-Huidobro Kirberg, Rosario Isabel; Ortuño Borroto, Duniel; Oyarzo Paredes, Natacha Valentina; Naranjo, Claudia; Véliz, Claudia P.
    Introducción: los procesos de enseñanza aprendizaje en odontología deben adaptarse permanentemente a los cambios sociales, demográficos, científicos y tecnológicos, con el fin de formar profesionales con un perfil de egreso basado en conocimientos, habilidades y actitudes integrales, conectados con la realidad y necesidades de la sociedad, que impacten positivamente en el sistema de salud. El propósito de esta revisión narrativa fue analizar los principales desafíos de la educación en odontología reportados en la literatura y proponer acciones concretas para abordarlos. Métodos: a través de un método de consenso, un panel de nueve expertos seleccionó las principales áreas donde se presentan estos desafíos, para luego realizar una búsqueda de información científica en inglés y español, consultando las bases de datos MEDLINE vía PubMed, ERIC (EBSCO), Scopus, SciELO y Google Scholar. Resultados: los cuatro desafíos para la educación en odontología analizados fueron: responsabilidad social de la educación, perfil de egreso de en diferentes contextos, metodologías de enseñanza aprendizaje y sistemas de evaluación, procesos de titulación y certificación. Conclusiones: las acciones que sustentan los principales cambios requeridos a nivel nacional e internacional en la educación en odontología necesitan el apoyo transversal de organizaciones gubernamentales, científicas, sociales y de las propias instituciones de educación superior, a través de un trabajo colaborativo. Este camino es vital para lograr la formación de cirujanos dentistas que serán reales agentes de cambio, preparados integralmente para insertarse en un sistema que garantice la calidad, seguridad, efectividad y equidad en salud bucal.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Emergency remote teaching in a health administration and management course for dental students
    (2020) Moscoso Matus, Karla Soledad; Véliz, Claudia P.; GarcÍa-Huidobro Kirberg, Rosario Isabel
  • No Thumbnail Available
    Item
    Generative artificial intelligence in dentistry: Current approaches and future challenges
    (2024) Villena, F.; Véliz, Claudia P.; García-Huidobro Munita, Rosario; Aguayo Paul, Sebastián
    Artificial intelligence (AI) has become a commodity for people because of the advent of generative AI (GenAI) models that bridge the usability gap of AI by providing a natural language interface to interact with complex models. These GenAI models range from text generation - such as two-way chat systems - to the generation of image or video from textual descriptions input by a user. These advancements in AI have impacted Dentistry in multiple aspects. In dental education, the student now has the opportunity to solve a plethora of questions by only prompting a GenAI model and have the answer in a matter of seconds. GenAI models can help us deliver better patient healthcare by helping practitioners gather knowledge quickly and efficiently. Finally, GenAI can also be used in dental research, where the applications range from new drug discovery to assistance in academic writing. In this review, we first define GenAI models and describe their multiple generation modalities; then, we explain and discuss their current and potential applications in Dentistry; and finally, we describe the challenges these new technologies impose in our area.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Number of Remaining Teeth and Its Association with Educational Level in Chilean Adults
    (2020) Margozzini Maira, Paula; Berríos, R.; GarcÍa-Huidobro Kirberg, Rosario Isabel; Véliz, Claudia P.; Valle, C. del; Vargas Catelican, Juan Pablo; Padilla Pérez, Oslando; Ortuño Borroto, Duniel
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Políticas públicas que favorecen la salud bucal : recomendaciones internacionales y análisis de la situación en Chile
    (Centro de Políticas Públicas UC, 2019) Cantarutti Martínez, Cynthia; Véliz, Claudia P.; Guerra Ferrada, Carolina
  • No Thumbnail Available
    Item
    Transformation of case-based learning workshops into an online modality in a public health course
    (2020) Véliz, Claudia P.; Cantarutti Martínez, Cynthia
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Validity of the self-reported number of teeth in Chilean adults
    (2019) Margozzini Maira, Paula; Berríos, Rodrigo.; Cantarutti Martínez, Cynthia; Véliz, Claudia P.; Ortuño Borroto, Duniel
    Abstract Background Clinical dental evaluations are considered complex and costly measurements that epidemiological surveillance studies of multiple simultaneous chronic diseases currently require, for example National Health Surveys (ENS). Accordingly, simpler and more affordable methods need to be validated. The aim of this study was to assess the validity of the self-report on the total number of teeth in the general Chilean adult population. Methods A substudy was conducted on ENS 2016–2017 participants. A stratified random sample of 101 of them was subjected to a telephone questionnaire. This information was then compared with the results obtained from the oral examination performed by a trained nurse during a home visit. Spearman correlations, intraclass correlation coefficients and the Bland-Altman method were used to analyse the data. Results In men, the average number of teeth recorded during the oral examination coincided with the number of teeth in the self-report (22 teeth). In women, the total teeth average was 18 and 19 teeth according to the examination and self-report, respectively. For the total number of participants, a strong and significant Spearman correlation was obtained (ρ = 0.93); in men and women, the Spearman correlation observed was also strong and significant (ρ = 0.90 and ρ = 0.96 respectively). The value of the intraclass correlation coefficient indicated a significant concordance (CCI = 0.96) in both men and women (CCI = 0.93 and 0.98 respectively). A tendency to greater correlation was observed as the number of teeth decreased. Conclusions The number of teeth self-reported by the subjects in this study correlated with the number of teeth recorded in the clinical examination. Self-report is a valid method to determine the number of teeth in national health surveys.Abstract Background Clinical dental evaluations are considered complex and costly measurements that epidemiological surveillance studies of multiple simultaneous chronic diseases currently require, for example National Health Surveys (ENS). Accordingly, simpler and more affordable methods need to be validated. The aim of this study was to assess the validity of the self-report on the total number of teeth in the general Chilean adult population. Methods A substudy was conducted on ENS 2016–2017 participants. A stratified random sample of 101 of them was subjected to a telephone questionnaire. This information was then compared with the results obtained from the oral examination performed by a trained nurse during a home visit. Spearman correlations, intraclass correlation coefficients and the Bland-Altman method were used to analyse the data. Results In men, the average number of teeth recorded during the oral examination coincided with the number of teeth in the self-report (22 teeth). In women, the total teeth average was 18 and 19 teeth according to the examination and self-report, respectively. For the total number of participants, a strong and significant Spearman correlation was obtained (ρ = 0.93); in men and women, the Spearman correlation observed was also strong and significant (ρ = 0.90 and ρ = 0.96 respectively). The value of the intraclass correlation coefficient indicated a significant concordance (CCI = 0.96) in both men and women (CCI = 0.93 and 0.98 respectively). A tendency to greater correlation was observed as the number of teeth decreased. Conclusions The number of teeth self-reported by the subjects in this study correlated with the number of teeth recorded in the clinical examination. Self-report is a valid method to determine the number of teeth in national health surveys.Abstract Background Clinical dental evaluations are considered complex and costly measurements that epidemiological surveillance studies of multiple simultaneous chronic diseases currently require, for example National Health Surveys (ENS). Accordingly, simpler and more affordable methods need to be validated. The aim of this study was to assess the validity of the self-report on the total number of teeth in the general Chilean adult population. Methods A substudy was conducted on ENS 2016–2017 participants. A stratified random sample of 101 of them was subjected to a telephone questionnaire. This information was then compared with the results obtained from the oral examination performed by a trained nurse during a home visit. Spearman correlations, intraclass correlation coefficients and the Bland-Altman method were used to analyse the data. Results In men, the average number of teeth recorded during the oral examination coincided with the number of teeth in the self-report (22 teeth). In women, the total teeth average was 18 and 19 teeth according to the examination and self-report, respectively. For the total number of participants, a strong and significant Spearman correlation was obtained (ρ = 0.93); in men and women, the Spearman correlation observed was also strong and significant (ρ = 0.90 and ρ = 0.96 respectively). The value of the intraclass correlation coefficient indicated a significant concordance (CCI = 0.96) in both men and women (CCI = 0.93 and 0.98 respectively). A tendency to greater correlation was observed as the number of teeth decreased. Conclusions The number of teeth self-reported by the subjects in this study correlated with the number of teeth recorded in the clinical examination. Self-report is a valid method to determine the number of teeth in national health surveys.Abstract Background Clinical dental evaluations are considered complex and costly measurements that epidemiological surveillance studies of multiple simultaneous chronic diseases currently require, for example National Health Surveys (ENS). Accordingly, simpler and more affordable methods need to be validated. The aim of this study was to assess the validity of the self-report on the total number of teeth in the general Chilean adult population. Methods A substudy was conducted on ENS 2016–2017 participants. A stratified random sample of 101 of them was subjected to a telephone questionnaire. This information was then compared with the results obtained from the oral examination performed by a trained nurse during a home visit. Spearman correlations, intraclass correlation coefficients and the Bland-Altman method were used to analyse the data. Results In men, the average number of teeth recorded during the oral examination coincided with the number of teeth in the self-report (22 teeth). In women, the total teeth average was 18 and 19 teeth according to the examination and self-report, respectively. For the total number of participants, a strong and significant Spearman correlation was obtained (ρ = 0.93); in men and women, the Spearman correlation observed was also strong and significant (ρ = 0.90 and ρ = 0.96 respectively). The value of the intraclass correlation coefficient indicated a significant concordance (CCI = 0.96) in both men and women (CCI = 0.93 and 0.98 respectively). A tendency to greater correlation was observed as the number of teeth decreased. Conclusions The number of teeth self-reported by the subjects in this study correlated with the number of teeth recorded in the clinical examination. Self-report is a valid method to determine the number of teeth in national health surveys.Abstract Background Clinical dental evaluations are considered complex and costly measurements that epidemiological surveillance studies of multiple simultaneous chronic diseases currently require, for example National Health Surveys (ENS). Accordingly, simpler and more affordable methods need to be validated. The aim of this study was to assess the validity of the self-report on the total number of teeth in the general Chilean adult population. Methods A substudy was conducted on ENS 2016–2017 participants. A stratified random sample of 101 of them was subjected to a telephone questionnaire. This information was then compared with the results obtained from the oral examination performed by a trained nurse during a home visit. Spearman correlations, intraclass correlation coefficients and the Bland-Altman method were used to analyse the data. Results In men, the average number of teeth recorded during the oral examination coincided with the number of teeth in the self-report (22 teeth). In women, the total teeth average was 18 and 19 teeth according to the examination and self-report, respectively. For the total number of participants, a strong and significant Spearman correlation was obtained (ρ = 0.93); in men and women, the Spearman correlation observed was also strong and significant (ρ = 0.90 and ρ = 0.96 respectively). The value of the intraclass correlation coefficient indicated a significant concordance (CCI = 0.96) in both men and women (CCI = 0.93 and 0.98 respectively). A tendency to greater correlation was observed as the number of teeth decreased. Conclusions The number of teeth self-reported by the subjects in this study correlated with the number of teeth recorded in the clinical examination. Self-report is a valid method to determine the number of teeth in national health surveys.Abstract Background Clinical dental evaluations are considered complex and costly measurements that epidemiological surveillance studies of multiple simultaneous chronic diseases currently require, for example National Health Surveys (ENS). Accordingly, simpler and more affordable methods need to be validated. The aim of this study was to assess the validity of the self-report on the total number of teeth in the general Chilean adult population. Methods A substudy was conducted on ENS 2016–2017 participants. A stratified random sample of 101 of them was subjected to a telephone questionnaire. This information was then compared with the results obtained from the oral examination performed by a trained nurse during a home visit. Spearman correlations, intraclass correlation coefficients and the Bland-Altman method were used to analyse the data. Results In men, the average number of teeth recorded during the oral examination coincided with the number of teeth in the self-report (22 teeth). In women, the total teeth average was 18 and 19 teeth according to the examination and self-report, respectively. For the total number of participants, a strong and significant Spearman correlation was obtained (ρ = 0.93); in men and women, the Spearman correlation observed was also strong and significant (ρ = 0.90 and ρ = 0.96 respectively). The value of the intraclass correlation coefficient indicated a significant concordance (CCI = 0.96) in both men and women (CCI = 0.93 and 0.98 respectively). A tendency to greater correlation was observed as the number of teeth decreased. Conclusions The number of teeth self-reported by the subjects in this study correlated with the number of teeth recorded in the clinical examination. Self-report is a valid method to determine the number of teeth in national health surveys.Abstract Background Clinical dental evaluations are considered complex and costly measurements that epidemiological surveillance studies of multiple simultaneous chronic diseases currently require, for example National Health Surveys (ENS). Accordingly, simpler and more affordable methods need to be validated. The aim of this study was to assess the validity of the self-report on the total number of teeth in the general Chilean adult population. Methods A substudy was conducted on ENS 2016–2017 participants. A stratified random sample of 101 of them was subjected to a telephone questionnaire. This information was then compared with the results obtained from the oral examination performed by a trained nurse during a home visit. Spearman correlations, intraclass correlation coefficients and the Bland-Altman method were used to analyse the data. Results In men, the average number of teeth recorded during the oral examination coincided with the number of teeth in the self-report (22 teeth). In women, the total teeth average was 18 and 19 teeth according to the examination and self-report, respectively. For the total number of participants, a strong and significant Spearman correlation was obtained (ρ = 0.93); in men and women, the Spearman correlation observed was also strong and significant (ρ = 0.90 and ρ = 0.96 respectively). The value of the intraclass correlation coefficient indicated a significant concordance (CCI = 0.96) in both men and women (CCI = 0.93 and 0.98 respectively). A tendency to greater correlation was observed as the number of teeth decreased. Conclusions The number of teeth self-reported by the subjects in this study correlated with the number of teeth recorded in the clinical examination. Self-report is a valid method to determine the number of teeth in national health surveys.Abstract Background Clinical dental evaluations are considered complex and costly measurements that epidemiological surveillance studies of multiple simultaneous chronic diseases currently require, for example National Health Surveys (ENS). Accordingly, simpler and more affordable methods need to be validated. The aim of this study was to assess the validity of the self-report on the total number of teeth in the general Chilean adult population. Methods A substudy was conducted on ENS 2016–2017 participants. A stratified random sample of 101 of them was subjected to a telephone questionnaire. This information was then compared with the results obtained from the oral examination performed by a trained nurse during a home visit. Spearman correlations, intraclass correlation coefficients and the Bland-Altman method were used to analyse the data. Results In men, the average number of teeth recorded during the oral examination coincided with the number of teeth in the self-report (22 teeth). In women, the total teeth average was 18 and 19 teeth according to the examination and self-report, respectively. For the total number of participants, a strong and significant Spearman correlation was obtained (ρ = 0.93); in men and women, the Spearman correlation observed was also strong and significant (ρ = 0.90 and ρ = 0.96 respectively). The value of the intraclass correlation coefficient indicated a significant concordance (CCI = 0.96) in both men and women (CCI = 0.93 and 0.98 respectively). A tendency to greater correlation was observed as the number of teeth decreased. Conclusions The number of teeth self-reported by the subjects in this study correlated with the number of teeth recorded in the clinical examination. Self-report is a valid method to determine the number of teeth in national health surveys.Abstract Background Clinical dental evaluations are considered complex and costly measurements that epidemiological surveillance studies of multiple simultaneous chronic diseases currently require, for example National Health Surveys (ENS). Accordingly, simpler and more affordable methods need to be validated. The aim of this study was to assess the validity of the self-report on the total number of teeth in the general Chilean adult population. Methods A substudy was conducted on ENS 2016–2017 participants. A stratified random sample of 101 of them was subjected to a telephone questionnaire. This information was then compared with the results obtained from the oral examination performed by a trained nurse during a home visit. Spearman correlations, intraclass correlation coefficients and the Bland-Altman method were used to analyse the data. Results In men, the average number of teeth recorded during the oral examination coincided with the number of teeth in the self-report (22 teeth). In women, the total teeth average was 18 and 19 teeth according to the examination and self-report, respectively. For the total number of participants, a strong and significant Spearman correlation was obtained (ρ = 0.93); in men and women, the Spearman correlation observed was also strong and significant (ρ = 0.90 and ρ = 0.96 respectively). The value of the intraclass correlation coefficient indicated a significant concordance (CCI = 0.96) in both men and women (CCI = 0.93 and 0.98 respectively). A tendency to greater correlation was observed as the number of teeth decreased. Conclusions The number of teeth self-reported by the subjects in this study correlated with the number of teeth recorded in the clinical examination. Self-report is a valid method to determine the number of teeth in national health surveys.Abstract Background Clinical dental evaluations are considered complex and costly measurements that epidemiological surveillance studies of multiple simultaneous chronic diseases currently require, for example National Health Surveys (ENS). Accordingly, simpler and more affordable methods need to be validated. The aim of this study was to assess the validity of the self-report on the total number of teeth in the general Chilean adult population. Methods A substudy was conducted on ENS 2016–2017 participants. A stratified random sample of 101 of them was subjected to a telephone questionnaire. This information was then compared with the results obtained from the oral examination performed by a trained nurse during a home visit. Spearman correlations, intraclass correlation coefficients and the Bland-Altman method were used to analyse the data. Results In men, the average number of teeth recorded during the oral examination coincided with the number of teeth in the self-report (22 teeth). In women, the total teeth average was 18 and 19 teeth according to the examination and self-report, respectively. For the total number of participants, a strong and significant Spearman correlation was obtained (ρ = 0.93); in men and women, the Spearman correlation observed was also strong and significant (ρ = 0.90 and ρ = 0.96 respectively). The value of the intraclass correlation coefficient indicated a significant concordance (CCI = 0.96) in both men and women (CCI = 0.93 and 0.98 respectively). A tendency to greater correlation was observed as the number of teeth decreased. Conclusions The number of teeth self-reported by the subjects in this study correlated with the number of teeth recorded in the clinical examination. Self-report is a valid method to determine the number of teeth in national health surveys.Abstract Background Clinical dental evaluations are considered complex and costly measurements that epidemiological surveillance studies of multiple simultaneous chronic diseases currently require, for example National Health Surveys (ENS). Accordingly, simpler and more affordable methods need to be validated. The aim of this study was to assess the validity of the self-report on the total number of teeth in the general Chilean adult population. Methods A substudy was conducted on ENS 2016–2017 participants. A stratified random sample of 101 of them was subjected to a telephone questionnaire. This information was then compared with the results obtained from the oral examination performed by a trained nurse during a home visit. Spearman correlations, intraclass correlation coefficients and the Bland-Altman method were used to analyse the data. Results In men, the average number of teeth recorded during the oral examination coincided with the number of teeth in the self-report (22 teeth). In women, the total teeth average was 18 and 19 teeth according to the examination and self-report, respectively. For the total number of participants, a strong and significant Spearman correlation was obtained (ρ = 0.93); in men and women, the Spearman correlation observed was also strong and significant (ρ = 0.90 and ρ = 0.96 respectively). The value of the intraclass correlation coefficient indicated a significant concordance (CCI = 0.96) in both men and women (CCI = 0.93 and 0.98 respectively). A tendency to greater correlation was observed as the number of teeth decreased. Conclusions The number of teeth self-reported by the subjects in this study correlated with the number of teeth recorded in the clinical examination. Self-report is a valid method to determine the number of teeth in national health surveys.Abstract Background Clinical dental evaluations are considered complex and costly measurements that epidemiological surveillance studies of multiple simultaneous chronic diseases currently require, for example National Health Surveys (ENS). Accordingly, simpler and more affordable methods need to be validated. The aim of this study was to assess the validity of the self-report on the total number of teeth in the general Chilean adult population. Methods A substudy was conducted on ENS 2016–2017 participants. A stratified random sample of 101 of them was subjected to a telephone questionnaire. This information was then compared with the results obtained from the oral examination performed by a trained nurse during a home visit. Spearman correlations, intraclass correlation coefficients and the Bland-Altman method were used to analyse the data. Results In men, the average number of teeth recorded during the oral examination coincided with the number of teeth in the self-report (22 teeth). In women, the total teeth average was 18 and 19 teeth according to the examination and self-report, respectively. For the total number of participants, a strong and significant Spearman correlation was obtained (ρ = 0.93); in men and women, the Spearman correlation observed was also strong and significant (ρ = 0.90 and ρ = 0.96 respectively). The value of the intraclass correlation coefficient indicated a significant concordance (CCI = 0.96) in both men and women (CCI = 0.93 and 0.98 respectively). A tendency to greater correlation was observed as the number of teeth decreased. Conclusions The number of teeth self-reported by the subjects in this study correlated with the number of teeth recorded in the clinical examination. Self-report is a valid method to determine the number of teeth in national health surveys.Abstract Background Clinical dental evaluations are considered complex and costly measurements that epidemiological surveillance studies of multiple simultaneous chronic diseases currently require, for example National Health Surveys (ENS). Accordingly, simpler and more affordable methods need to be validated. The aim of this study was to assess the validity of the self-report on the total number of teeth in the general Chilean adult population. Methods A substudy was conducted on ENS 2016–2017 participants. A stratified random sample of 101 of them was subjected to a telephone questionnaire. This information was then compared with the results obtained from the oral examination performed by a trained nurse during a home visit. Spearman correlations, intraclass correlation coefficients and the Bland-Altman method were used to analyse the data. Results In men, the average number of teeth recorded during the oral examination coincided with the number of teeth in the self-report (22 teeth). In women, the total teeth average was 18 and 19 teeth according to the examination and self-report, respectively. For the total number of participants, a strong and significant Spearman correlation was obtained (ρ = 0.93); in men and women, the Spearman correlation observed was also strong and significant (ρ = 0.90 and ρ = 0.96 respectively). The value of the intraclass correlation coefficient indicated a significant concordance (CCI = 0.96) in both men and women (CCI = 0.93 and 0.98 respectively). A tendency to greater correlation was observed as the number of teeth decreased. Conclusions The number of teeth self-reported by the subjects in this study correlated with the number of teeth recorded in the clinical examination. Self-report is a valid method to determine the number of teeth in national health surveys.