Browsing by Author "Steinmetz, M."

Now showing 1 - 4 of 4
  • No Thumbnail Available
    Item
    From the bulge to the outer disc: monospace StarHorse monospace stellar parameters, distances, and extinctions for stars in APOGEE DR16 and other spectroscopic surveys
    (2020) Queiroz, A. B. A.; Anders, F.; Chiappini, C.; Khalatyan, A.; Santiago, B. X.; Steinmetz, M.; Valentini, M.; Miglio, A.; Bossini, D.; Barbuy, B.; Minchev, I; Minniti, D.; Garcia Hernandez, D. A.; Schultheis, M.; Beaton, R. L.; Beers, T. C.; Bizyaev, D.; Brownstein, J. R.; Cunha, K.; Fernandez-Trincado, J. G.; Frinchaboy, P. M.; Lane, R. R.; Majewski, S. R.; Nataf, D.; Nitschelm, C.; Pan, K.; Roman-Lopes, A.; Sobeck, J. S.; Stringfellow, G.; Zamora, O.
    We combine high-resolution spectroscopic data from APOGEE-2 survey Data Release 16 (DR16) with broad-band photometric data from several sources as well as parallaxes from Gaia Data Release 2 (DR2). Using the Bayesian isochrone-fitting code StarHorse, we derived the distances, extinctions, and astrophysical parameters for around 388 815 APOGEE stars. We achieve typical distance uncertainties of similar to 6% for APOGEE giants, similar to 2% for APOGEE dwarfs, and extinction uncertainties of similar to 0.07 mag, when all photometric information is available, and similar to 0.17 mag if optical photometry is missing. StarHorse uncertainties vary with the input spectroscopic catalogue, available photometry, and parallax uncertainties. To illustrate the impact of our results, we show that thanks to Gaia DR2 and the now larger sky coverage of APOGEE-2 (including APOGEE-South), we obtain an extended map of the Galactic plane. We thereby provide an unprecedented coverage of the disc close to the Galactic mid-plane (|Z(Gal)| < 1 kpc) from the Galactic centre out to R-Gal20 kpc. The improvements in statistics as well as distance and extinction uncertainties unveil the presence of the bar in stellar density and the striking chemical duality in the innermost regions of the disc, which now clearly extend to the inner bulge. We complement this paper with distances and extinctions for stars in other public released spectroscopic surveys: 324 999 in GALAH DR2, 4 928 715 in LAMOST DR5, 408 894 in RAVE DR6, and 6095 in GES DR3.
  • No Thumbnail Available
    Item
    The Gaia-ESO Public Spectroscopic Survey: Implementation, data products, open cluster survey, science, and legacy
    (2022) Randich, S.; Gilmore, G.; Magrini, L.; Sacco, G. G.; Jackson, R. J.; Jeffries, R. D.; Worley, C. C.; Hourihane, A.; Gonneau, A.; Vazquez, C. Viscasillas; Franciosini, E.; Lewis, J. R.; Alfaro, E. J.; Allende Prieto, C.; Bensby, T.; Blomme, R.; Bragaglia, A.; Flaccomio, E.; Francois, P.; Irwin, M. J.; Koposov, S. E.; Korn, A. J.; Lanzafame, A. C.; Pancino, E.; Recio-Blanco, A.; Smiljanic, R.; Van Eck, S.; Zwitter, T.; Asplund, M.; Bonifacio, P.; Feltzing, S.; Binney, J.; Drew, J.; Ferguson, A. M. N.; Micela, G.; Negueruela, I; Prusti, T.; Rix, H-W; Vallenari, A.; Bayo, A.; Bergemann, M.; Biazzo, K.; Carraro, G.; Casey, A. R.; Damiani, F.; Frasca, A.; Heiter, U.; Hill, V; Jofre, P.; de Laverny, P.; Lind, K.; Marconi, G.; Martayan, C.; Masseron, T.; Monaco, L.; Morbidelli, L.; Prisinzano, L.; Sbordone, L.; Sousa, S. G.; Zaggia, S.; Adibekyan, V; Bonito, R.; Caffau, E.; Daflon, S.; Feuillet, D. K.; Gebran, M.; Gonzalez Hernandez, J., I; Guiglion, G.; Herrero, A.; Lobel, A.; Maiz Apellaniz, J.; Merle, T.; Mikolaitis, S.; Montes, D.; Morel, T.; Soubiran, C.; Spina, L.; Tabernero, H. M.; Tautvaisiene, G.; Traven, G.; Valentini, M.; Van der Swaelmen, M.; Villanova, S.; Wright, N. J.; Abbas, U.; Borsen-Koch, V. Aguirre; Alves, J.; Balaguer-Nunez, L.; Barklem, P. S.; Barrado, D.; Berlanas, S. R.; Binks, A. S.; Bressan, A.; Capuzzo-Dolcetta, R.; Casagrande, L.; Casamiquela, L.; Collins, R. S.; D'Orazi, V; Dantas, M. L. L.; Debattista, V. P.; Delgado-Mena, E.; Di Marcantonio, P.; Drazdauskas, A.; Evans, N. W.; Famaey, B.; Franchini, M.; Fremat, Y.; Friel, E. D.; Fu, X.; Geisler, D.; Gerhard, O.; Solares, E. A. Gonzalez; Grebel, E. K.; Gutierrez Albarran, M. L.; Hatzidimitriou, D.; Held, E., V; Jimenez-Esteban, F.; Jonsson, H.; Jordi, C.; Khachaturyants, T.; Kordopatis, G.; Kos, J.; Lagarde, N.; Mahy, L.; Mapelli, M.; Marfil, E.; Martell, S. L.; Messina, S.; Miglio, A.; Minchev, I; Moitinho, A.; Montalban, J.; Monteiro, M. J. P. F. G.; Morossi, C.; Mowlavi, N.; Mucciarelli, A.; Murphy, D. N. A.; Nardetto, N.; Ortolani, S.; Paletou, F.; Palous, J.; Paunzen, E.; Pickering, J. C.; Quirrenbach, A.; Fiorentin, P. Re; Read, J., I; Romano, D.; Ryde, N.; Sanna, N.; Santos, W.; Seabroke, G. M.; Spagna, A.; Steinmetz, M.; Stonkute, E.; Sutorius, E.; Thevenin, F.; Tosi, M.; Tsantaki, M.; Vink, J. S.; Wright, N.; Wyse, R. F. G.; Zoccali, M.; Zorec, J.; Zucker, D. B.; Walton, N. A.
    Context. In the last 15 years different ground-based spectroscopic surveys have been started (and completed) with the general aim of delivering stellar parameters and elemental abundances for large samples of Galactic stars, complementing Gaia astrometry. Among those surveys, the Gaia-ESO Public Spectroscopic Survey, the only one performed on a 8m class telescope, was designed to target 100 000 stars using FLAMES on the ESO VLT (both Giraffe and UVES spectrographs), covering all the Milky Way populations, with a special focus on open star clusters.
  • No Thumbnail Available
    Item
    The Gaia-ESO Public Spectroscopic Survey: Motivation, implementation, GIRAFFE data processing, analysis, and final data products☆
    (2022) Gilmore, G.; Randich, S.; Worley, C. C.; Hourihane, A.; Gonneau, A.; Sacco, G. G.; Lewis, J. R.; Magrini, L.; Francois, P.; Jeffries, R. D.; Koposov, S. E.; Bragaglia, A.; Alfaro, E. J.; Allende Prieto, C.; Blomme, R.; Korn, A. J.; Lanzafame, A. C.; Pancino, E.; Recio-Blanco, A.; Smiljanic, R.; Van Eck, S.; Zwitter, T.; Bensby, T.; Flaccomio, E.; Irwin, M. J.; Franciosini, E.; Morbidelli, L.; Damiani, F.; Bonito, R.; Friel, E. D.; Vink, J. S.; Prisinzano, L.; Abbas, U.; Hatzidimitriou, D.; Held, E., V; Jordi, C.; Paunzen, E.; Spagna, A.; Jackson, R. J.; Maiz Apellaniz, J.; Asplund, M.; Bonifacio, P.; Feltzing, S.; Binney, J.; Drew, J.; Ferguson, A. M. N.; Micela, G.; Negueruela, I; Prusti, T.; Rix, H-W; Vallenari, A.; Bergemann, M.; Casey, A. R.; de Laverny, P.; Frasca, A.; Hill, V; Lind, K.; Sbordone, L.; Sousa, S. G.; Adibekyan, V; Caffau, E.; Daflon, S.; Feuillet, D. K.; Gebran, M.; Gonzalez Hernandez, J., I; Guiglion, G.; Herrero, A.; Lobel, A.; Montes, D.; Morel, T.; Ruchti, G.; Soubiran, C.; Tabernero, H. M.; Tautvaisiene, G.; Traven, G.; Valentini, M.; Van der Swaelmen, M.; Villanova, S.; Vazquez, C. Viscasillas; Bayo, A.; Biazzo, K.; Carraro, G.; Edvardsson, B.; Heiter, U.; Jofre, P.; Marconi, G.; Martayan, C.; Masseron, T.; Monaco, L.; Walton, N. A.; Zaggia, S.; Borsen-Koch, V. Aguirre; Alves, J.; Balaguer-Nunez, L.; Barklem, P. S.; Barrado, D.; Bellazzini, M.; Berlanas, S. R.; Binks, A. S.; Bressan, A.; Capuzzo-Dolcetta, R.; Casagrande, L.; Casamiquela, L.; Collins, R. S.; D'Orazi, V; Dantas, M. L. L.; Debattista, V. P.; Delgado-Mena, E.; Di Marcantonio, P.; Drazdauskas, A.; Evans, N. W.; Famaey, B.; Franchini, M.; Fremat, Y.; Fu, X.; Geisler, D.; Gerhard, O.; Solares, E. A. Gonzalez; Grebel, E. K.; Gutierrez Albarran, M. L.; Jimenez-Esteban, F.; Jonsson, H.; Khachaturyants, T.; Kordopatis, G.; Kos, J.; Lagarde, N.; Ludwig, H-G; Mahy, L.; Mapelli, M.; Marfil, E.; Martell, S. L.; Messina, S.; Miglio, A.; Minchev, I; Moitinho, A.; Montalban, J.; Monteiro, M. J. P. F. G.; Morossi, C.; Mowlavi, N.; Mucciarelli, A.; Murphy, D. N. A.; Nardetto, N.; Ortolani, S.; Paletou, F.; Palous, J.; Pickering, J. C.; Quirrenbach, A.; Fiorentin, P. Re; Read, J., I; Romano, D.; Ryde, N.; Sanna, N.; Santos, W.; Seabroke, G. M.; Spina, L.; Steinmetz, M.; Stonkute, E.; Sutorius, E.; Thevenin, F.; Tosi, M.; Tsantaki, M.; Wright, N.; Wyse, R. F. G.; Zoccali, M.; Zorec, J.; Zucker, D. B.
    Context. The Gaia-ESO Public Spectroscopic Survey is an ambitious project designed to obtain astrophysical parameters and elemental abundances for 100 000 stars, including large representative samples of the stellar populations in the Galaxy, and a well-defined sample of 60 (plus 20 archive) open clusters. We provide internally consistent results calibrated on benchmark stars and star clusters, extending across a very wide range of abundances and ages. This provides a legacy data set of intrinsic value, and equally a large wide-ranging dataset that is of value for the homogenisation of other and future stellar surveys and Gaia's astrophysical parameters. Aims. This article provides an overview of the survey methodology, the scientific aims, and the implementation, including a description of the data processing for the GIRAFFE spectra. A companion paper introduces the survey results. Methods. Gaia-ESO aspires to quantify both random and systematic contributions to measurement uncertainties. Thus, all available spectroscopic analysis techniques are utilised, each spectrum being analysed by up to several different analysis pipelines, with considerable effort being made to homogenise and calibrate the resulting parameters. We describe here the sequence of activities up to delivery of processed data products to the ESO Science Archive Facility for open use. Results. The Gaia-ESO Survey obtained 202 000 spectra of 115 000 stars using 340 allocated VLT nights between December 2011 and January 2018 from GIRAFFE and UVES. Conclusions. The full consistently reduced final data set of spectra was released through the ESO Science Archive Facility in late 2020, with the full astrophysical parameters sets following in 2022. A companion article reviews the survey implementation, scientific highlights, the open cluster survey, and data products.
  • No Thumbnail Available
    Item
    The Milky Way bar and bulge revealed by APOGEE and Gaia EDR3
    (2021) Queiroz, A. B. A.; Chiappini, C.; Perez-Villegas, A.; Khalatyan, A.; Anders, F.; Barbuy, B.; Santiago, B. X.; Steinmetz, M.; Cunha, K.; Schultheis, M.; Majewski, S. R.; Minchev, I; Minniti, D.; Beaton, R. L.; Cohen, R. E.; da Costa, L. N.; Fernandez-Trincado, J. G.; Garcia-Hernandez, D. A.; Geisler, D.; Hasselquist, S.; Lane, R. R.; Nitschelm, C.; Rojas-Arriagada, A.; Roman-Lopes, A.; Smith, V; Zasowski, G.
    We investigate the inner regions of the Milky Way using data from APOGEE and Gaia EDR3. Our inner Galactic sample has more than 26 500 stars within |X-Gal|< 5 kpc, |Y-Gal|< 3.5 kpc, |Z(Gal)|< 1 kpc, and we also carry out the analysis for a foreground-cleaned subsample of 8000 stars that is more representative of the bulge-bar populations. These samples allow us to build chemo-dynamical maps of the stellar populations with vastly improved detail. The inner Galaxy shows an apparent chemical bimodality in key abundance ratios [alpha/Fe], [C/N], and [Mn/O], which probe different enrichment timescales, suggesting a star formation gap (quenching) between the high- and low-alpha populations. Using a joint analysis of the distributions of kinematics, metallicities, mean orbital radius, and chemical abundances, we can characterize the different populations coexisting in the innermost regions of the Galaxy for the first time. The chemo-kinematic data dissected on an eccentricity-|Z|(max) plane reveal the chemical and kinematic signatures of the bar, the thin inner disc, and an inner thick disc, and a broad metallicity population with large velocity dispersion indicative of a pressure-supported component. The interplay between these different populations is mapped onto the different metallicity distributions seen in the eccentricity-|Z|(max) diagram consistently with the mean orbital radius and V-phi distributions. A clear metallicity gradient as a function of |Z|(max) is also found, which is consistent with the spatial overlapping of different populations. Additionally, we find and chemically and kinematically characterize a group of counter-rotating stars that could be the result of a gas-rich merger event or just the result of clumpy star formation during the earliest phases of the early disc that migrated into the bulge. Finally, based on 6D information, we assign stars a probability value of being on a bar orbit and find that most of the stars with large bar orbit probabilities come from the innermost 3 kpc, with a broad dispersion of metallicity. Even stars with a high probability of belonging to the bar show chemical bimodality in the [alpha/Fe] versus [Fe/H] diagram. This suggests bar trapping to be an efficient mechanism, explaining why stars on bar orbits do not show a significant, distinct chemical abundance ratio signature.