• La Universidad
    • Historia
    • Rectoría
    • Autoridades
    • Secretaría General
    • Pastoral UC
    • Organización
    • Hechos y cifras
    • Noticias UC
  • 2011-03-15-13-28-09
  • Facultades
    • Agronomía e Ingeniería Forestal
    • Arquitectura, Diseño y Estudios Urbanos
    • Artes
    • Ciencias Biológicas
    • Ciencias Económicas y Administrativas
    • Ciencias Sociales
    • College
    • Comunicaciones
    • Derecho
    • Educación
    • Filosofía
    • Física
    • Historia, Geografía y Ciencia Política
    • Ingeniería
    • Letras
    • Matemáticas
    • Medicina
    • Química
    • Teología
    • Sede regional Villarrica
  • 2011-03-15-13-28-09
  • Organizaciones vinculadas
  • 2011-03-15-13-28-09
  • Bibliotecas
  • 2011-03-15-13-28-09
  • Mi Portal UC
  • 2011-03-15-13-28-09
  • Correo UC
- Repository logo
  • English
  • Català
  • Čeština
  • Deutsch
  • Español
  • Français
  • Gàidhlig
  • Latviešu
  • Magyar
  • Nederlands
  • Polski
  • Português
  • Português do Brasil
  • Suomi
  • Svenska
  • Türkçe
  • Қазақ
  • বাংলা
  • हिंदी
  • Ελληνικά
  • Yкраї́нська
  • Log in
    Log in
    Have you forgotten your password?
Repository logo
  • Communities & Collections
  • All of DSpace
  • English
  • Català
  • Čeština
  • Deutsch
  • Español
  • Français
  • Gàidhlig
  • Latviešu
  • Magyar
  • Nederlands
  • Polski
  • Português
  • Português do Brasil
  • Suomi
  • Svenska
  • Türkçe
  • Қазақ
  • বাংলা
  • हिंदी
  • Ελληνικά
  • Yкраї́нська
  • Log in
    Log in
    Have you forgotten your password?
  1. Home
  2. Browse by Author

Browsing by Author "Sok, Leo"

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Results Per Page
Sort Options
  • No Thumbnail Available
    Item
    Validation of 4D Flow based relative pressure maps in aortic flows
    (2021) Nolte, David; Urbina, Jesus; Sotelo, Julio; Sok, Leo; Montalba, Cristian; Valverde, Israel; Osses, Axel; Uribe, Sergio; Bertoglio, Cristobal
    While the clinical gold standard for pressure difference measurements is invasive catheterization, 4D Flow MRI is a promising tool for enabling a non-invasive quantification, by linking highly spatially resolved velocity measurements with pressure differences via the incompressible Navier-Stokes equations. In this work we provide a validation and comparison with phantom and clinical patient data of pressure difference maps estimators. We compare the classical Pressure Poisson Estimator (PPE) and the new Stokes Estimator (STE) against catheter pressure measurements under a variety of stenosis severities and flow intensities. Specifically, we use several 4D Flow data sets of realistic aortic phantoms with different anatomic and hemodynamic severities and two patients with aortic coarctation. The phantom data sets are enriched by subsampling to lower resolutions, modification of the segmentation and addition of synthetic noise, in order to study the sensitivity of the pressure difference estimators to these factors. Overall, the STE method yields more accurate results than the PPE method compared to catheterization data. The superiority of the STE becomes more evident at increasing Reynolds numbers with a better capacity of capturing pressure gradients in strongly convective flow regimes. The results indicate an improved robustness of the STE method with respect to variation in lumen segmentation. However, with heuristic removal of the wall-voxels, the PPE can reach a comparable accuracy for lower Reynolds' numbers. (c) 2021 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier B.V. This is an open access article under the CC BY license ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ )

Bibliotecas - Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile- Dirección oficinas centrales: Av. Vicuña Mackenna 4860. Santiago de Chile.

  • Cookie settings
  • Privacy policy
  • End User Agreement
  • Send Feedback

We collect and process your personal information for the following purposes: Authentication, Preferences, Acknowledgement and Statistics.
To learn more, please read our
privacy policy.

Customize