Browsing by Author "Puig, S."

Now showing 1 - 4 of 4
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Characterization of individuals at high risk of developing melanoma in Latin America : bases for genetic counseling in melanoma.
    (2016) Puig, S.; Potrony, M.; Cuellar, F.; Puig-Butille, J. A.; Carrera, C.; Aguilera Fuenzalida, Pablo René; Nagore, E.; Garcia-Casado, Z.; Molgó Novell, Montserrat; Kumar, R.; Landman, G.; Costa Soares de Sá, B.; Gargantini Rezze, G.; Facure, L.; Ribeiro de Avila, A. L.; Achatz, M. I.; Carraro, D. M.; Duprat Neto, J. P.; Grazziotin, T. C.; Bonamigo, R.; Rey, M. C.; Balestrini, C.; Morales, E.; Requena, C.; Bakos, R.; Ashton-Prolla, P.; Giugliani, R.; Larre Borges, A.; Barquet, V.; Pérez, J.; Martínez, M.; Cabo, H.; Cohen Sabban, E.; Latorre, C.; Carlos-Ortega, B.; Salas-Alanis, J.; Gonzalez, R.; Olazaran, Z.; Malvehy, J.; Badenas, C.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Consenso de terminología en microscopia confocal de reflectancia en español mediante método Delphi
    (2023) Abarzúa, Alvaro; Banuls, J.; Cabo, H.; Carrera, C.; Gamo, R.; González, S.; Jaimes, N.; Navarrete Dechent, Cristián Patricio; Perez Anker J.; Roldan Marín, R.; Segura, S.; Yelamos, O.; Puig, S.; Malvehy, J.
    La terminología usada para describir los diferentes hallazgos en la microscopía confocal de reflectancia (MCR), tanto en lesiones melanocíticas, como en no melanocíticas se ha consensuado en inglés. En el presente trabajo, se proponen los términos en español que mejor interpretan estos conceptos ya descritos para la MCR, mediante el consenso de expertos de distintas nacionalidades de habla hispana y utilizando el método DELPHI para el acuerdo final. Se obtuvieron 52 términos en total, de los cuales 28 fueron para lesiones melanocíticas y 24 para lesiones no melanocíticas. El uso de la nomenclatura propuesta permitirá una homogeneización y mejor entendimiento de las estructuras; una descripción más estandarizada en los registros clínicos y una mejor interpretación de estos informes por otros dermatólogos.
  • No Thumbnail Available
    Item
    Human surface anatomy terminology for dermatology: a Delphi consensus from the International Skin Imaging Collaboration
    (2020) Navarrete-Dechent, C.; Liopyris, K.; Molenda, M. A.; Braun, R.; Curiel-Lewandrowski, C.; Dusza, S. W.; Guitera, P.; Hofmann-Wellenhof, R.; Kittler, H.; Lallas, A.; Malvehy, J.; Marchetti, M. A.; Oliviero, M.; Pellacani, G.; Puig, S.; Soyer, H. P.; Tejasvi, T.; Thomas, L.; Tschandl, P.; Scope, A.; Marghoob, A. A.; Halpern, A. C.
    Background There is no internationally vetted set of anatomic terms to describe human surface anatomy. Objective To establish expert consensus on a standardized set of terms that describe clinically relevant human surface anatomy. Methods We conducted a Delphi consensus on surface anatomy terminology between July 2017 and July 2019. The initial survey included 385 anatomic terms, organized in seven levels of hierarchy. If agreement exceeded the 75% established threshold, the term was considered 'accepted' and included in the final list. Terms added by the participants were passed on to the next round of consensus. Terms with <75% agreement were included in subsequent surveys along with alternative terms proposed by participants until agreement was reached on all terms. Results The Delphi included 21 participants. We found consensus (>= 75% agreement) on 361/385 (93.8%) terms and eliminated one term in the first round. Of 49 new terms suggested by participants, 45 were added via consensus. To adjust for a recently published International Classification of Diseases-Surface Topography list of terms, a third survey including 111 discrepant terms was sent to participants. Finally, a total of 513 terms reached agreement via the Delphi method. Conclusions We have established a set of 513 clinically relevant terms for denoting human surface anatomy, towards the use of standardized terminology in dermatologic documentation.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Reflectance Confocal Microscopy Terminology in Spanish: A Delphi Consensus Study
    (2024) Abarzua-Araya, A.; Banuls, J.; Cabo, H.; Carrera, C.; Gamo, R.; Gonzalez, S.; Jaimes, N.; Navarrete-Dechent, C.; Anker, J. Perez; Roldan-Marin, R.; Segura, S.; Yelamos, O.; Puig, S.; Malvehy, J.
    The terminology used to describe reflectance confocal microscopy (RCM) findings in both melanocytic and nonmelanocytic lesions has been standardized in English. We convened a panel of Spanish-speaking RCM experts and used the Delphi method to seek consensus on which Spanish terms best describe RCM findings in this setting. The experts agreed on 52 terms: 28 for melanocytic lesions and 24 for nonmelanocytic lesions. The resulting terminology will facilitate homogenization, leading to a better understanding of structures, more standardized descriptions in clinical registries, and easier interpretation of clinical reports exchanged between dermatologists. (c) 2024 Published by Elsevier Espan a, S.L.U. on behalf of AEDV. This is an open access article under the CC BY -NC -ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).