Browsing by Author "Oliviero, Margaret"

Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
  • No Thumbnail Available
    Item
    Perifollicular linear projections: A dermatoscopic criterion for the diagnosis of lentigo maligna on the face
    (2024) Navarrete-Dechent, Cristian; Jaimes, Natalia; Dusza, Stephen W.; Liopyris, Konstantinos; Marchetti, Michael A.; Cordova, Miguel; Oliviero, Margaret; Villaseca, Miguel A.; Pulitzer, Melissa; Busam, Klaus J.; Rossi, Anthony M.; Rabinovitz, Harold S.; Nehal, Kishwer S.; Scope, Alon; Marghoob, Ashfaq A.
    Background: Lentigo maligna (LM) can mimic benign, flat, pigmented lesions and can be challenging to diagnose. Objective: To describe a new dermatoscopic feature termed "perifollicular linear projections (PLP)"as a diagnostic criterion for LM on the face. Methods: Retrospective study on reflectance confocal microscopy and dermatoscopy images of flat facial pigmented lesions originating from 2 databases. PLP were defined as short, linear, pigmented projections emanating from hair follicles. Dermatoscopy readers were blinded to the final histopathologic diagnosis. Results: From 83 consecutive LMs, 21/83 (25.3%) displayed "bulging of hair follicles"on reflectance confocal microscopy and 18 of these 21 (85.7%), displayed PLP on dermatoscopy. From a database of 2873 consecutively imaged and biopsied lesions, 252 flat-pigmented facial lesions were included. PLP was seen in 47/76 melanomas (61.8%), compared with 7/176 lesions (3.9%) with other diagnosis (P \ .001). The sensitivity was 61.8% (95% CI, 49.9%-72.7%), specificity 96.0% (95% CI, 92.9%-98.4%). PLP was independently associated with LM diagnosis on multivariate analysis (OR 26.1 [95% CI, 9.6%-71.0]). Limitations: Retrospective study. Conclusion: PLP is a newly described dermatoscopic criterion that may add specificity and sensitivity to the early diagnosis of LM located on the face. We postulate that PLP constitutes an intermediary step in the LM progression model. ( J Am Acad Dermatol 2024;90:52-7.)
  • No Thumbnail Available
    Item
    Reflectance confocal microscopy terminology for non-melanocytic skin lesions: A Delphi consensus of experts
    (Elsevier Inc., 2025) Navarrete Dechent, Cristian Patricio; Longo, Caterina; Liopyris, Konstantinos; Ardigo, Marco; Ahlgrimm-Siess, Verena; Bahadoran, Phillipe; Carrera, Cristina; Braga, Juliana Casagrande Tavoloni; Chen, Chih-Shan J.; Correa, Lilia; Carvahlo, Nathalie de; Durkin, John; Farnetani, Francesca; Grant-Kels, Jane M.; Gill, Melissa; Gonzalez, Salvador; Hartmann, Daniela; Hoffman-Wellenhof, Rainer; Huho, Albert; Ludzik, Joanna; Malvehy, Josep; Marghoob, Ashfaq A.; Moscarella, Elvira; Oliviero, Margaret; Puig, Susana; Rabinovitz, Harold; Rao, Babar; Rezze, Gisele G.; Rossi, Anthony M.; Rubinstein, Gene; Ruini, Cristel; Sattler, Elke; Soyer, H. Peter; Schwartz, Rodrigo; Thng, Steven; Ulrich, Martina; Witkowski, Alexander; Dusza, Stephen W.; Guitera, Pascale; Pellacani, Giovanni; Scope, Alon; Jain, Manu
    Background There is lack of uniformity in reflectance confocal microscopy (RCM) terminology. Objective To establish expert consensus on a standardized set of RCM terms that describe non-melanocytic lesions (NML). Methods We invited RCM experts to participate in a Delphi-consensus study. Fifty-nine RCM descriptors were extracted from a previous systematic review on RCM terminology for describing NML. Of these, 35 items were presented as 4 groups of synonymous terms and 24 items as single, non-synonymous terms. For the first round, an agreement threshold was set at >70%. Participants could also propose new terms. Terms with ≤70% agreement and newly proposed terms were carried over to the next round. For subsequent rounds, agreement threshold was set at >50%. Results The study was conducted between June 2021 and May 2023. Forty-two of 44 (95%) invited experts participated. Three iterative Delphi rounds were completed, resulting in a consensus list of 36 terms, including 32 synonymous- and 4 non-synonymous- terms for describing NML. Limitations Only experts were included. We did not evaluate definitions of terms in the study. Conclusions We propose a simplified list of RCM terms, vetted by RCM experts, for describing and diagnosing NML. Uniform terminology could benefit clinical practice, research, and education.