Browsing by Author "Olivares Labbé, María Teresa"

Now showing 1 - 3 of 3
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Ciencia Abierta, una introducción
    Olivares Labbé, María Teresa; Rojas Díaz, Gloria Angélica; Rondanelli Delpiano, Renzo; Sistema de Bibliotecas de la Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Corticosteroids for Eosinophilic Esophagitis in Children: A Meta-analysis
    (2020) Olivares Labbé, María Teresa
    CONTEXT: Treatment of eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) is focused on dietary, pharmacologic, and endoscopic therapy options. Within the pharmacologic alternatives, topical corticosteroids are the most used, and a large number of studies evaluating their effectiveness have been published, requiring a new summary of evidence.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Designing feedback processes in the workplace-based learning of undergraduate health professions education: a scoping review
    (2024) Fuentes Cimma, Javiera Carolina; Sluijsmans, Dominique; Riquelme Pérez, Arnoldo Javier; Villagrán Gutiérrez, Ignacio Andrés; Isbej Espósito, Lorena Pilar; Olivares Labbé, María Teresa; Heeneman, Sylvia
    Background: Feedback processes are crucial for learning, guiding improvement, and enhancing performance. In workplace-based learning settings, diverse teaching and assessment activities are advocated to be designed and implemented, generating feedback that students use, with proper guidance, to close the gap between current and desired performance levels. Since productive feedback processes rely on observed information regarding a student's performance, it is imperative to establish structured feedback activities within undergraduate workplace-based learning settings. However, these settings are characterized by their unpredictable nature, which can either promote learning or present challenges in offering structured learning opportunities for students. This scoping review maps literature on how feedback processes are organised in undergraduate clinical workplace-based learning settings, providing insight into the design and use of feedback. Methods: A scoping review was conducted. Studies were identified from seven databases and ten relevant journals in medical education. The screening process was performed independently in duplicate with the support of the StArt program. Data were organized in a data chart and analyzed using thematic analysis. The feedback loop with a sociocultural perspective was used as a theoretical framework. Results: The search yielded 4,877 papers, and 61 were included in the review. Two themes were identified in the qualitative analysis: (1) The organization of the feedback processes in workplace-based learning settings, and (2) Sociocultural factors influencing the organization of feedback processes. The literature describes multiple teaching and assessment activities that generate feedback information. Most papers described experiences and perceptions of diverse teaching and assessment feedback activities. Few studies described how feedback processes improve performance. Sociocultural factors such as establishing a feedback culture, enabling stable and trustworthy relationships, and enhancing student feedback agency are crucial for productive feedback processes. Conclusions: this review identified concrete ideas regarding how feedback could be organized within the clinical workplace to promote feedback processes. The feedback encounter should be organized to allow follow-up of the feedback, i.e., working on required learning and performance goals at the next occasion. The educational programs should design feedback processes by appropriately planning subsequent tasks and activities. More insight is needed in designing a full-loop feedback process, in which specific attention is needed in effective feedforward practices.