Browsing by Author "Miguieles, Rodrigo"

Now showing 1 - 4 of 4
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Diagnóstico y manejo de colitis ulcerosa grave. Una mirada actualizada
    (2017) Hernandez Rocha, Cristian; Ibanez, Patricio; Elena Molina, Maria; Klaassen, Julieta; Valenzuela, Andrea; Candia, Roberto; Bellolio, Felipe; Zuniga, Alvaro; Miguieles, Rodrigo; Francisco Miquel, Juan; Chianale, Jose; Alvarez Lobos, Manuel
    Ulcerative Colitis (UC) is a chronic inflammatory disease involving the colon, with alternating periods of remission and activity. Exacerbations can be severe and associated with complications and mortality. Diagnosis of severe UC is based on clinical, biochemical and endoscopic variables. Patients with severe UC must be hospitalized. First line therapy is the use of intravenous corticoids which achieve clinical remission in most patients. However, 25% of patients will be refractory to corticoids, situation that should be evaluated at the third day of therapy. In patients without response, cytomegalovirus infection must be quickly ruled out to escalate to second line therapy with biological drugs or cyclosporine. Total colectomy must not be delayed if there is no response to second line therapy, if there is a contraindication for second line therapies or there are complications such as: megacolon, perforation or massive bleeding. An active management with quick escalation on therapy allows to decrease the prolonged exposure to corticoids, reduce colectomy rates and its perioperative complications.
  • No Thumbnail Available
    Item
    Implementation of intracorporeal anastomosis in laparoscopic right colectomy is safe and associated with a shorter hospital stay
    (2021) Jarry, Cristian; Carcamo, Leonardo; Jose Gonzalez, Juan; Bellolio, Felipe; Miguieles, Rodrigo; Urrejola, Gonzalo; Zuniga, Alvaro; Crovari, Fernando; Elena Molina, Maria; Tomas Larach, Jose
    Reconstruction after laparoscopic right colectomy (LRC) can be achieved by performing an intracorporeal (IA) or an extracorporeal anastomosis (EA). This study aims to assess the safety of implementing IA in LRC, and to compare its perioperative outcomes with EA during an institution's learning curve. Patients undergoing elective LRC with IA or EA in a teaching university hospital between January 2015 and December 2018 were included. Demographic, clinical, perioperative and histopathological data were collated and outcomes investigated. One hundred and twenty-two patients were included; forty-three (35.2%) had an IA. The main indication for surgery was cancer in both groups (83.7% for IA and 79.8% for EA;p = 0.50). Operative time was longer for IA (180 [150-205] versus 150 [120-180] minutes;p < 0.001). A Pfannenstiel incision was used as extraction site in 97.7% of patients receiving an IA; while a midline incision was used in 97.5% of patients having an EA (p < 0.001). Hospital stay was significantly shorter for IA (3 [3, 4] versus 4 [3-6] days;p = 0.003). There were no differences in postoperative complications rates between groups. There was a 4.7% and 3.8% anastomotic leak rate in the IA and EA group, respectively (p = 1). Re-intervention and readmission rates were similar between groups, and there was no mortality during the study period. The implementation of IA in LRC is safe. Despite longer operative times, IA is associated with a shorter hospital stay when compared to EA in the setting of an institution's learning curve.
  • No Thumbnail Available
    Item
    Laparoscopic colon surgery: time to leave the urinary catheter in the operating room?
    (2024) Riquoir, Christophe; Vela, Javier; Lascano, Raquel; Urrejola, Gonzalo; Bellolio, Felipe; Molina, Maria Elena; Miguieles, Rodrigo; Larach, Jose Tomas
    Introduction'Fast track' guidelines have incorporated multimodal measures to optimize perioperative outcomes in surgery, with laparoscopy being a pivotal component for its advantages in early recovery. In this setting, current recommendations regarding the use of a urinary catheter suggest its removal within the first 24-hours postoperatively. However, few studies have assessed the feasibility of leaving the operating room without it. The purpose of this study is to compare the perioperative outcomes of patients undergoing elective laparoscopic colonic resections leaving the operating room with and without a urinary catheter.MethodsA retrospective study was conducted utilizing prospectively collected data from patients undergoing elective colon resections over a 17-month period. The patients were classified into two groups based on the presence or absence of a urinary catheter upon leaving the operating room, and subsequently, their perioperative outcomes were compared.ResultsA total of 107 patients met the inclusion criteria (n = 28 with a urinary catheter and n = 79 without). Cancer was the most prevalent diagnosis (83.2%), and right hemicolectomy the most frequently performed surgery (32.7%). Two events of urinary catheter reinsertions were reported, both in the no-catheter group (0% vs 2.53%, p = 0.969), and there were no cases of urinary tract infections. The overall and severe complications rates exhibited no significant differences (25% vs. 26.6%, p = 1, and 7.14% vs. 5.06%, p = 1) and the length of stay was similar (p = 0.220).ConclusionRemoving the urinary catheter before leaving the operating room appears to be safe and associated with very low rates of urinary retention in selected patients undergoing laparoscopic colonic or upper rectal resections.
  • No Thumbnail Available
    Item
    Learning curve and safety of the implementation of laparoscopic complete mesocolic excision with intracorporeal anastomosis for right-sided colon cancer: results from a propensity score-matched study
    (2024) Vela, Javier; Riquoir, Christophe; Jarry, Cristian; Silva, Felipe; Besser, Nicolas; Urrejola, Gonzalo; Molina, Maria Elena; Miguieles, Rodrigo; Bellolio, Felipe; Larach, Jose Tomas
    BackgroundRetrospective studies and randomized controlled trials support the safety of laparoscopic complete mesocolic excision (CME) for the treatment of right-sided colon cancer (RSCC). Few studies, however, examine the learning curve of this operation and its impact on safety during an implementation period. We aim to evaluate the learning curve and safety of the implementation of laparoscopic CME with intracorporeal anastomosis for RSCC.MethodsConsecutive patients undergoing a laparoscopic right colectomy with intracorporeal anastomosis for RSCC between January 2016 and June 2023 were included. Clinical, perioperative, and histopathological variables were collected. Correlation and cumulative sum (CUSUM) analyses between the operating time and case number were performed. Breakpoints of the learning curve were estimated using the broken-line model. CME and conventional laparoscopic right colectomy outcomes were compared after propensity score matching (PSM).ResultsTwo hundred and ninety patients underwent laparoscopic right colectomy during study period. One hundred and eight met inclusion criteria. After PSM, 56 non-CME and 28 CME patients were compared. CME group had a non-statistically significant tendency to a longer operating time (201 versus 195 min; p = 0.657) and a shorter hospital stay (3 versus 4 days; p = 0.279). No significant differences were found in total complication rates or their profile. Correlation analysis identified a significant trend toward operating time reduction with increasing case numbers (Pearson correlation coefficient = - 0.624; p = 0.001). According to the CUSUM analysis, an institutional learning curve was deemed completed after 13 cases and the broken-line model identified three phases: learning (1-6 cases), consolidation (7-13 cases), and mastery (after 13 cases).ConclusionThe learning curve of laparoscopic CME for RSCC can be achieved after 13 cases in centers with experience in advanced laparoscopic surgery and surgeons with familiarity with this technique. Its implementation within this setting seems to be as safe as performing a conventional right colectomy.