Browsing by Author "Labbé, Gricel"
Now showing 1 - 4 of 4
Results Per Page
Sort Options
- ItemAcceso exclusionario y racista a la vivienda formal e informal en las áreas centrales de Santiago e Iquique(2015) Contreras Gatica, Yasna del Carmen; Ala-Louko, Veera; Labbé, Gricel
- ItemMarginalidad Urbana y Efectos Institucionales: Desinversión, ineficacia y estigmatización en Santiago de Chile(RIL editores, 2019) Ruiz-Tagle, Javier; Alvarez, Martín; Labbé, Gricel; Ruiz-Tagle, Javier; Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile. Instituto de Estudios Urbanos y Territoriales
- ItemRecuperación de plusvalías para financiar la inserción de viviendas sociales en barrios consolidados(Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, 2019) Labbé, Gricel; Muñoz, Juan Carlos; Rocco, Víctor; Ruiz-Tagle, Javier; Schuster, Juan Pablo; Irarrázabal, Ignacio, Piña, Elisa, Letelier, Magdalena y Jeldes, María Ignacia
- ItemUrban marginality and institutional effects: Disinvestment, inefficacy, and stigmatization in Santiago de Chile(2023) Ruiz-Tagle V., Javier; Álvarez Vandeputte, Martín; Labbé, Gricel; CEDEUS (Chile)“Neighborhood effects” research, which maintains that poverty concentration generates a variety of social problems, has been questioned for concealing the role of powerful institutions. As an alternative, we focus on external institutions’ practices in marginal neighborhoods and their impact on the emergence of social problems. Through a qualitative case-study of three neighborhoods in Santiago, we observed institutional practices and identified three distinct mechanisms. Through disinvestments, these neighborhoods have been turned into “Red Zones,” because of public, private, and civil institutions’ refusal to establish themselves and to deliver their services there. Through inaction and inefficacy, public intervention has been deeply intermittent, negligent, and uncoordinated. Finally, through territorial stigmatization, these neighborhoods have almost become no-go areas. Several material and symbolic consequences have resulted from these practices, including direct and indirect connections with social problems. These have implications for the debate on “neighborhood effects” and for social mix policies.