Browsing by Author "Hernandez, Glenn"

Now showing 1 - 5 of 5
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Consistency of data reporting in fluid responsiveness studies in the critically ill setting: the CODEFIRE consensus from the Cardiovascular Dynamic section of the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine
    (2024) Messina, Antonio; Chew, Michelle S.; Poole, Daniele; Calabro, Lorenzo; De Backer, Daniel; Donadello, Katia; Hernandez, Glenn; Hamzaoui, Olfa; Jozwiak, Mathieu; Lai, Christopher; Malbrain, Manu L. N. G.; Mallat, Jihad; Myatra, Sheyla Nainan; Muller, Laurent; Ospina-Tascon, Gustavo; Pinsky, Michael R.; Preau, Sebastian; Saugel, Bernd; Teboul, Jean-Louis; Cecconi, Maurizio; Monnet, Xavier
    PurposeTo provide consensus recommendations regarding hemodynamic data reporting in studies investigating fluid responsiveness and fluid challenge (FC) use in the intensive care unit (ICU).MethodsThe Executive Committee of the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine (ESICM) commissioned and supervised the project. A panel of 18 international experts and a methodologist identified main domains and items from a systematic literature, plus 2 ancillary domains. A three-step Delphi process based on an iterative approach was used to obtain the final consensus. In the Delphi 1 and 2, the items were selected with strong (>= 80% of votes) or week agreement (70-80% of votes), while the Delphi 3 generated recommended (>= 90% of votes) or suggested (80-90% of votes) items (RI and SI, respectively).ResultsWe identified 5 main domains initially including 117 items and the consensus finally resulted in 52 recommendations or suggestions: 18 RIs and 2 SIs statements were obtained for the domain "ICU admission", 11 RIs and 1 SI for the domain "mechanical ventilation", 5 RIs for the domain "reason for giving a FC", 8 RIs for the domain pre- and post-FC "hemodynamic data", and 7 RIs for the domain "pre-FC infused drugs". We had no consensus on the use of echocardiography, strong agreement regarding the volume (4 ml/kg) and the reference variable (cardiac output), while weak on administration rate (within 10 min) of FC in this setting.ConclusionThis consensus found 5 main domains and provided 52 recommendations for data reporting in studies investigating fluid responsiveness in ICU patients.
  • No Thumbnail Available
    Item
    Doppler identified venous congestion in septic shock: protocol for an international, multi-centre prospective cohort study (Andromeda-VEXUS)
    (2023) Prager, Ross; Argaiz, Eduardo; Pratte, Michael; Rola, Philippe; Arntfield, Robert; Beaubien-Souligny, William; Denault, Andre Y.; Haycock, Korbin; Aguiar, Francisco Miralles; Bakker, Jan; Ospina-Tascon, Gustavo; Orozco, Nicolas; Rochwerg, Bram; Lewis, Kimberley; Quazi, Ibrahim; Kattan, Eduardo; Hernandez, Glenn; Basmaji, John
    Introduction Venous congestion is a pathophysiological state where high venous pressures cause organ oedema and dysfunction. Venous congestion is associated with worse outcomes, particularly acute kidney injury (AKI), for critically ill patients. Venous congestion can be measured by Doppler ultrasound at the bedside through interrogation of the inferior vena cava (IVC), hepatic vein (HV), portal vein (PV) and intrarenal veins (IRV). The objective of this study is to quantify the association between Doppler identified venous congestion and the need for renal replacement therapy (RRT) or death for patients with septic shock.Methods and analysis This study is a prespecified substudy of the ANDROMEDA-SHOCK 2 (AS-2) randomised control trial (RCT) assessing haemodynamic resuscitation in septic shock and will enrol at least 350 patients across multiple sites. We will include adult patients within 4 hours of fulfilling septic shock definition according to Sepsis-3 consensus conference. Using Doppler ultrasound, physicians will interrogate the IVC, HV, PV and IRV 6-12 hours after randomisation. Study investigators will provide web-based educational sessions to ultrasound operators and adjudicate image acquisition and interpretation. The primary outcome will be RRT or death within 28 days of septic shock. We will assess the hazard of RRT or death as a function of venous congestion using a Cox proportional hazards model. Sub-distribution HRs will describe the hazard of RRT given the competing risk of death.Ethics and dissemination We obtained ethics approval for the AS-2 RCT, including this observational substudy, from local ethics boards at all participating sites. We will report the findings of this study through open-access publication, presentation at international conferences, a coordinated dissemination strategy by investigators through social media, and an open-access workshop series in multiple languages.Trial registration number NCT05057611.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Persistent sepsis-induced hypotension without hyperlactatemia: Is it really septic shock?
    (W B SAUNDERS CO-ELSEVIER INC, 2011) Hernandez, Glenn; Castro, Ricardo; Romero, Carlos; de la Hoz, Claudio; Angulo, Daniela; Aranguiz, Ignacio; Larrondo, Jorge; Bujes, Andres; Bruhn, Alejandro
    Purpose: The prognostic value of hyperlactatemia in septic shock is unquestionable. However, as current definitions do not include hyperlactatemia as a mandatory criterion, some hypotensive patients may be diagnosed as having septic shock despite exhibiting normolactatemia. The significance of persistent sepsis-induced hypotension without hyperlactatemia is unclear. Is it really septic shock? Our aim was to determine differences in outcome between patients diagnosed as having septic shock but exhibiting normal vs elevated lactate levels during evolution. We also explored the potential implications of including hyperlactatemia as an obligatory diagnostic criterion.
  • No Thumbnail Available
    Item
    The emerging concept of fluid tolerance: A position paper
    (2022) Kattan, Eduardo; Castro, Ricardo; Miralles-Aguiar, Francisco; Hernandez, Glenn; Rola, Philippe
    Available online xxxx Fluid resuscitation is a core component of emergency and critical care medicine. While the focus of clinicians has largely been on detecting patients who would respond to fluid therapy, relatively little work has been done on assessing patients' tolerance to this therapy. In this article we seek to review the concept of fluid tolerance, propose a working definition, and introduce relevant clinical signals by which physicians can assess fluid tolerance, hopefully becoming a starting point for further research.
  • No Thumbnail Available
    Item
    The seven Ts of capillary refill time: more than a clinical sign for septic shock patients
    (LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS, 2020) Vera, Magdalena; Kattan, Eduardo; Castro, Ricardo; Hernandez, Glenn