• La Universidad
    • Historia
    • Rectoría
    • Autoridades
    • Secretaría General
    • Pastoral UC
    • Organización
    • Hechos y cifras
    • Noticias UC
  • 2011-03-15-13-28-09
  • Facultades
    • Agronomía e Ingeniería Forestal
    • Arquitectura, Diseño y Estudios Urbanos
    • Artes
    • Ciencias Biológicas
    • Ciencias Económicas y Administrativas
    • Ciencias Sociales
    • College
    • Comunicaciones
    • Derecho
    • Educación
    • Filosofía
    • Física
    • Historia, Geografía y Ciencia Política
    • Ingeniería
    • Letras
    • Matemáticas
    • Medicina
    • Química
    • Teología
    • Sede regional Villarrica
  • 2011-03-15-13-28-09
  • Organizaciones vinculadas
  • 2011-03-15-13-28-09
  • Bibliotecas
  • 2011-03-15-13-28-09
  • Mi Portal UC
  • 2011-03-15-13-28-09
  • Correo UC
- Repository logo
  • English
  • Català
  • Čeština
  • Deutsch
  • Español
  • Français
  • Gàidhlig
  • Latviešu
  • Magyar
  • Nederlands
  • Polski
  • Português
  • Português do Brasil
  • Suomi
  • Svenska
  • Türkçe
  • Қазақ
  • বাংলা
  • हिंदी
  • Ελληνικά
  • Yкраї́нська
  • Log in
    Log in
    Have you forgotten your password?
Repository logo
  • Communities & Collections
  • All of DSpace
  • English
  • Català
  • Čeština
  • Deutsch
  • Español
  • Français
  • Gàidhlig
  • Latviešu
  • Magyar
  • Nederlands
  • Polski
  • Português
  • Português do Brasil
  • Suomi
  • Svenska
  • Türkçe
  • Қазақ
  • বাংলা
  • हिंदी
  • Ελληνικά
  • Yкраї́нська
  • Log in
    Log in
    Have you forgotten your password?
  1. Home
  2. Browse by Author

Browsing by Author "Fuentes, Claudio"

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Results Per Page
Sort Options
  • Loading...
    Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Analytical categories to describe deficit attributions in deep disagreements between citizens and experts
    (2021) Fuentes, Claudio ; Goñi, Julian “Iñaki” ; Miranda, Constanza
    Disagreements often arise from citizen-expert collaboration, as both agents share a different epistemic worldview. Fogelin, following Wittgenstein, proposed that some disagreements (i.e. deep disagreements) cannot be rationally solved when participants share different forms of life. Citizen-expert is an exemplar of this sort of disagreement. Moreover, deep disagreements are often followed by deficit attributions from one of the agents to the other, regarding their epistemic understanding, credibility, and motives. Articulating the notions of deep disagreements and deficit attributions, as well as reviewing the complementary concept of epistemic injustice, we have constructed analytical categories that allow us to understand two things: (1) how deficit attributions operate in dialogical contexts of deep disagreements and (2) what types of deficit attributions we can find. We expect that this characterization can serve to analyze citizen-expert dialogues and the pursuit of more modest and inclusive forms of conversation.

Bibliotecas - Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile- Dirección oficinas centrales: Av. Vicuña Mackenna 4860. Santiago de Chile.

  • Cookie settings
  • Privacy policy
  • End User Agreement
  • Send Feedback