Browsing by Author "Esperatti, Mariano"

Now showing 1 - 3 of 3
  • No Thumbnail Available
    Item
    Early physiologic changes after awake prone positioning predict clinical outcomes in patients with acute hypoxemic respiratory failure
    (2024) Olmos, Matias; Esperatti, Mariano; Fuentes, Nora; Tirado, Anabel Miranda; Gonzalez, Maria Eugenia; Kakisu, Hiromi; Suarez, Juan; Tisminetzky, Manuel; Barbaresi, Veronica; Santomil, Ignacio; Cruz, Alejandro Bruhn; Grieco, Domenico Luca; Ferreyro, Bruno L.
    PurposeThe optimal physiologic parameters to monitor after a session of awake prone positioning in patients with acute respiratory failure are not well understood. This study aimed to identify which early physiologic changes after the first session of awake prone positioning are linked to the need for invasive mechanical ventilation or death in patients with acute respiratory failure. MethodsWe performed a secondary analysis of a prospective cohort study of adult patients with acute respiratory failure related to coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) treated with awake prone positioning. We assessed the association between relative changes in physiological variables (oxygenation, respiratory rate, pCO2 and respiratory rate-oxygenation [ROX] index) within the first 6 h of the first awake prone positioning session with treatment failure, defined as endotracheal intubation and/or death within 7 days. Results244 patients [70 female (29%), mean age 60 (standard deviation [SD] 13) years] were included. Seventy-one (29%) patients experienced awake prone positioning failure. ROX index was the main physiologic predictor. Patients with treatment failure had lower mean [SD] ROX index at baseline [5 (1.4) versus 6.6 (2.2), p < 0.0001] and within 6 h of prone positioning [5.6 (1.7) versus 8.7 (2.8), p < 0.0001]. After adjusting for baseline characteristics and severity, a relative increase of the ROX index compared to baseline was associated with lower odds of failure [odds ratio (OR) 0.37; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.25-0.54 every 25% increase]. ConclusionRelative changes in the ROX index within 6 h of the first awake prone positioning session along with other known predictive factors are associated with intubation and mortality at day 7.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Early short course of neuromuscular blocking agents in patients with COVID-19 ARDS : a propensity score analysis
    (2022) Li Bassi, Gianluigi; Gibbons, Kristen; Suen, Jacky Y.; Dalton, Heidi J.; White, Nicole; Corley, Amanda; Shrapnel, Sally; Hinton, Samuel; Forsyth, Simon; Vera Alarcón, María Magdalena; Fan, Eddy; Fanning, Jonathon P.; Panigada, Mauro; Bartlett, Robert; Brodie, Daniel; Burrell, Aidan; Chiumello, Davide; Elhazmi, Alyaa; Esperatti, Mariano; Grasselli, Giacomo; Hodgson, Carol; Ichiba, Shingo; Luna, Carlos; Marwali, Eva; Merson, Laura; Murthy, Srinivas; Nichol, Alistair; Ogino, Mark; Pelosi, Paolo; Torres, Antoni; Ng, Pauline Y.; Fraser, John F.; Laffey, John G.
    Background: The role of neuromuscular blocking agents (NMBAs) in coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) is not fully elucidated. Therefore, we aimed to investigate in COVID-19 patients with moderate-to-severe ARDS the impact of early use of NMBAs on 90-day mortality, through propensity score (PS) matching analysis. Methods: We analyzed a convenience sample of patients with COVID-19 and moderate-to-severe ARDS, admitted to 244 intensive care units within the COVID-19 Critical Care Consortium, from February 1, 2020, through October 31, 2021. Patients undergoing at least 2 days and up to 3 consecutive days of NMBAs (NMBA treatment), within 48 h from commencement of IMV were compared with subjects who did not receive NMBAs or only upon commencement of IMV (control). The primary objective in the PS-matched cohort was comparison between groups in 90-day in-hospital mortality, assessed through Cox proportional hazard modeling. Secondary objectives were comparisons in the numbers of ventilator-free days (VFD) between day 1 and day 28 and between day 1 and 90 through competing risk regression. Results: Data from 1953 patients were included. After propensity score matching, 210 cases from each group were well matched. In the PS-matched cohort, mean (± SD) age was 60.3 ± 13.2 years and 296 (70.5%) were male and the most common comorbidities were hypertension (56.9%), obesity (41.1%), and diabetes (30.0%). The unadjusted hazard ratio (HR) for death at 90 days in the NMBA treatment vs control group was 1.12 (95% CI 0.79, 1.59, p = 0.534). After adjustment for smoking habit and critical therapeutic covariates, the HR was 1.07 (95% CI 0.72, 1.61, p = 0.729). At 28 days, VFD were 16 (IQR 0–25) and 25 (IQR 7–26) in the NMBA treatment and control groups, respectively (sub-hazard ratio 0.82, 95% CI 0.67, 1.00, p = 0.055). At 90 days, VFD were 77 (IQR 0–87) and 87 (IQR 0–88) (sub-hazard ratio 0.86 (95% CI 0.69, 1.07; p = 0.177). Conclusions: In patients with COVID-19 and moderate-to-severe ARDS, short course of NMBA treatment, applied early, did not significantly improve 90-day mortality and VFD. In the absence of definitive data from clinical trials, NMBAs should be indicated cautiously in this setting.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Impact of exposure time in awake prone positioning on clinical outcomes of patients with COVID-19-related acute respiratory failure treated with high-flow nasal oxygen: a multicenter cohort study
    (2022) Esperatti, Mariano; Busico, Marina; Fuentes, Nora Angélica; Gallardo, Adrián; Osatnik, Javier; Vitali, Alejandra; Wasinger, Elizabeth Gisele; Olmos, Matías; Quintana, Jorgelina; Bruhn, Alejandro
    Background: In patients with COVID-19-related acute respiratory failure (ARF), awake prone positioning (AW-PP) reduces the need for intubation in patients treated with high-flow nasal oxygen (HFNO). However, the effects of different exposure times on clinical outcomes remain unclear. We evaluated the effect of AW-PP on the risk of endotracheal intubation and in-hospital mortality in patients with COVID-19-related ARF treated with HFNO and analyzed the effects of different exposure times to AW-PP. Methods: this multicenter prospective cohort study in six ICUs of 6 centers in Argentine consecutively included patients > 18 years of age with confirmed COVID-19-related ARF requiring HFNO from June 2020 to January 2021. In the primary analysis, the main exposure was awake prone positioning for at least 6 h/day, compared to non-prone positioning (NON-PP). In the sensitivity analysis, exposure was based on the number of hours receiving AW-PP. Inverse probability weighting–propensity score (IPW-PS) was used to adjust the conditional probability of treatment assignment. The primary outcome was endotracheal intubation (ETI); and the secondary outcome was hospital mortality. Results : during the study period, 580 patients were screened and 335 were included; 187 (56%) tolerated AW-PP for [median (p25–75)] 12 (9–16) h/day and 148 (44%) served as controls. The IPW–propensity analysis showed standardized differences < 0.1 in all the variables assessed. After adjusting for other confounders, the OR (95% CI) for ETI in the AW-PP group was 0.36 (0.2–0.7), with a progressive reduction in OR as the exposure to AW-PP increased. The adjusted OR (95% CI) for hospital mortality in the AW-PP group ≥ 6 h/day was 0.47 (0.19–1.31). The exposure to prone positioning ≥ 8 h/d resulted in a further reduction in OR [0.37 (0.17–0.8)]. Conclusion : In the study population, AW-PP for ≥ 6 h/day reduced the risk of endotracheal intubation, and exposure ≥ 8 h/d reduced the risk of hospital mortality.