Browsing by Author "El-Kassas, Mohamed"

Now showing 1 - 5 of 5
  • No Thumbnail Available
    Item
    A multisociety Delphi consensus statement on new fatty liver disease nomenclature
    (2023) Rinella, Mary E.; Lazarus, Jeffrey V.; Ratziu, Vlad; Francque, Sven M.; Sanyal, Arun J.; Kanwal, Fasiha; Romero, Diana; Abdelmalek, Manal F.; Anstee, Quentin M.; Arab, Juan Pablo; Arrese, Marco; Bataller, Ramon; Beuers, Ulrich; Boursier, Jerome; Bugianesi, Elisabetta; Byrne, Christopher D.; Narro, Graciela E. Castro; Chowdhury, Abhijit; Cortez-Pinto, Helena; Cryer, Donna R.; Cusi, Kenneth; El-Kassas, Mohamed; Klein, Samuel; Eskridge, Wayne; Fan, Jiangao; Gawrieh, Samer; Guy, Cynthia D.; Harrison, Stephen A.; Kim, Seung Up; Koot, Bart G.; Korenjak, Marko; Howdley, Kris V.; Lacaille, Florence; Loomba, Rohit; Mitchell-Thain, Robert; Morgan, Timothy R.; Powell, Elisabeth E.; Roden, Michael; Romero-Gomez, Manuel; Silva, Marcelo; Singh, Shivaram Prasad; Sookbian, Silvia C.; Spearman, C. Wendy; Tiniakos, Dina; Valenti, Luca; Vos, Miriam B.; Wong, Vincent Wai-Sun; Xanthakos, Stavra; Yilmaz, Yusuf; Younossi, Zobair; Hobbs, Ansley; Villota-Rivas, Marcela; Newsome, Philip N.
    The principal limitations of the terms NAFLD and NASH are the reliance on exclusionary confounder terms and the use of potentially stigmatising language. This study set out to determine if content experts and patient advocates were in favour of a change in nomenclature and/or definition. A modified Delphi process was led by three large pan-national liver associations. The consensus was defined a priori as a supermajority (67%) vote. An independent committee of experts external to the nomenclature process made the final recommendation on the acronym and its diagnostic criteria. A total of 236 panellists from 56 countries participated in 4 online surveys and 2 hybrid meetings. Response rates across the 4 survey rounds were 87%, 83%, 83%, and 78%, respectively. Seventy-four percent of respondents felt that the current nomenclature was sufficiently flawed to consider a name change. The terms "nonalcoholic" and "fatty" were felt to be stigmatising by 61% and 66% of respondents, respectively. Steatotic liver disease was chosen as an overarching term to encompass the various aetiologies of steatosis. The term steato-hepatitis was felt to be an important pathophysiological concept that should be retained. The name chosen to replace NAFLD was metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD). There was consensus to change the definition to include the presence of at least 1 of 5 cardiometabolic risk factors. Those with no metabolic parameters and no known cause were deemed to have cryptogenic steatotic liver disease. A new category, outside pure metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease, termed metabolic and alcohol related/associated liver disease (MetALD), was selected to describe those with metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease, who consume greater amounts of alcohol per week (140-350 g/wk and 210-420 g/ wk for females and males, respectively). The new nomenclature and diagnostic criteria are widely supported and non-stigmatising, and can improve awareness and patient identification.(c) 2023 American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases (AASLD), European Association for the Study of the Liver (EASL), and Fundacion Clinica Medica Sur, A.C. Published by Wolters Kluwer/Elsevier B.V/ Elsevier Espana, S.L.U. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
  • No Thumbnail Available
    Item
    A multisociety Delphi consensus statement on new fatty liver disease nomenclature
    (2023) Rinella, Mary E.; Lazarus, Jeffrey V.; Ratziu, Vlad; Francque, Sven M.; Sanyal, Arun J.; Kanwal, Fasiha; Romero, Diana; Abdelmalek, Manal F.; Anstee, Quentin M.; Pablo Arab, Juan; Arrese, Marco; Bataller, Ramon; Beuers, Ulrich; Boursier, Jerome; Bugianesi, Elisabetta; Byrne, Christopher D.; Castro Narro, Graciela E.; Chowdhury, Abhijit; Cortez-Pinto, Helena; Cryer, Donna R.; Cusi, Kenneth; El-Kassas, Mohamed; Klein, Samuel; Eskridge, Wayne; Fan, Jiangao; Gawrieh, Samer; Guy, Cynthia D.; Harrison, Stephen A.; Kim, Seung Up; Koot, Bart G.; Korenjak, Marko; Kowdley, Kris V.; Lacaille, Florence; Loomba, Rohit; Mitchell-Thain, Robert; Morgan, Timothy R.; Powell, Elisabeth E.; Roden, Michael; Romero-Gomez, Manuel; Silva, Marcelo; Singh, Shivaram Prasad; Sookoian, Silvia C.; Spearman, C. Wendy; Tiniakos, Dina; Valenti, Luca; Vos, Miriam B.; Wong, Vincent Wai-Sun; Xanthakos, Stavra; Yilmaz, Yusuf; Younossi, Zobair; Hobbs, Ansley; Villota-Rivas, Marcela; Newsome, Philip N.
    The principal limitations of the terms NAFLD and NASH are the reliance on exclusionary confounder terms and the use of potentially stigmatising language. This study set out to determine if content experts and patient advocates were in favor of a change in nomenclature and/or definition. A modified Delphi process was led by three large pan-national liver associations. The consensus was defined a priori as a supermajority (67%) vote. An independent committee of experts external to the nomenclature process made the final recommendation on the acronym and its diagnostic criteria. A total of 236 panelists from 56 countries participated in 4 online surveys and 2 hybrid meetings. Response rates across the 4 survey rounds were 87%, 83%, 83%, and 78%, respectively. Seventy-four percent of respondents felt that the current nomenclature was sufficiently flawed to consider a name change. The terms "nonalcoholic" and "fatty" were felt to be stigmatising by 61% and 66% of respondents, respectively. Steatotic liver disease was chosen as an overarching term to encompass the various aetiologies of steatosis. The term steatohepatitis was felt to be an important pathophysiological concept that should be retained. The name chosen to replace NAFLD was metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease. There was consensus to change the definition to include the presence of at least 1 of 5 cardiometabolic risk factors. Those with no metabolic parameters and no known cause were deemed to have cryptogenic steatotic liver disease. A new category, outside pure metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease, termed metabolic and alcohol related/associated liver disease (MetALD), was selected to describe those with metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease, who consume greater amounts of alcohol per week (140-350 g/wk and 210-420 g/wk for females and males, respectively). The new nomenclature and diagnostic criteria are widely supported and nonstigmatising, and can improve awareness and patient identification.
  • No Thumbnail Available
    Item
    Development and validation of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease test: a simple sensitive and specific marker for early diagnosis of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease
    (2023) Omran, Mohamed; Omr, Mona; Mohamed, Amal A.; Abdelghafour, Reem A.; Muharram, Nashwa M.; Hassan, Mohamed B.; Fangry, Abobakrelsedik; Emran, Tarek; Arab, Juan P.; Arnold, Jorge; Diaz, Luis Antonio; Zheng, Ming-Hua; El-Kassas, Mohamed
    AimThis study aimed to develop a noninvasive test for identifying patients with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) based on clinical and routine laboratory data. MethodsThe developed model 'NAFLD test' was compared to the most commonly used NAFLD scores and then validated in three groups of NAFLD patients from five centers in Egypt, China, and Chile. Patients were divided into the discovery cohort (n = 212) and the validation study (n = 859). The ROC curve and stepwise multivariate discriminant analysis were used to develop and validate the NAFLD test and evaluate its diagnostic performance, which was then compared to other NAFLD scores. ResultsElevated C-reactive protein (CRP), cholesterol, BMI, and alanine aminotransferase (ALT) levels were significantly associated with NAFLD (P < 0.0001). NAFLD test is depicted as (-0.695 + 0.031 x BMI + 0.003 x cholesterol + 0.014 x ALT + 0.025 x CRP) to discriminate patients with NAFLD from healthy individuals. The area under the ROC curve (AUC) of the NAFLD test was 0.92 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.88-0.96]. The NAFLD test was the most accurate diagnostic indicator of NAFLD when compared to widely used NAFLD indices. Upon validating the NAFLD test, its AUC (95% CI) for distinguishing patients with NAFLD from healthy individuals was 0.95 (0.94-0.97), 0.90 (0.87-0.93), and 0.94 (0.91-0.97) in Egyptian, Chinese, and Chilean patients with NAFLD respectively. ConclusionThe NAFLD test is a new validated diagnostic biomarker that can be utilized for the early diagnosis of NAFLD with high diagnostic performance.
  • No Thumbnail Available
    Item
    Global survey of stigma among physicians and patients with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease
    (2024) Younossi, Zobair M.; Alqahtani, Saleh A.; Alswat, Khalid; Yilmaz, Yusuf; Keklikkiran, Caglayan; Funuyet-Salas, Jesus; Romero-Gomez, Manuel; Fan, Jian-Gao; Zheng, Ming-Hua; El-Kassas, Mohamed; Castera, Laurent; Liu, Chun-Jen; Wong, Vincent Wai-Sun; Zelber-Sagi, Shira; Allen, Alina M.; Lam, Brian; Treeprasertsuk, Sombat; Hameed, Saeed; Takahashi, Hirokazu; Kawaguchi, Takumi; Schattenberg, Joern M.; Duseja, Ajay; Newsome, Phil N.; Francque, Sven; Spearman, C. Wendy; Fernandez, Marlen I. Castellanos; Burra, Patrizia; Roberts, Stuart K.; Chan, Wah-Kheong; Arrese, Marco; Silva, Marcelo; Rinella, Mary; Singal, Ashwani K.; Gordon, Stuart; Fuchs, Michael; Alkhouri, Naim; Cusi, Kenneth; Loomba, Rohit; Ranagan, Jane; Eskridge, Wayne; Kautz, Achim; Ong, Janus P.; Kugelmas, Marcelo; Eguchi, Yuichiro; Diago, Moises; Yu, Ming-Lung; Gerber, Lynn; Fornaresio, Lisa; Nader, Fatema; Henry, Linda; Racila, Andrei; Golabi, Pegah; Stepanova, Maria; Carrieri, Patrizia; Lazarus, Jeffrey, V
    Background & Aims: Patients with fatty liver disease may experience stigma from the disease or comorbidities. In this cross-sectional study, we aimed to understand stigma among patients with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD)/nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) and healthcare providers. Methods: Members of the Global NASH Council created two surveys about experiences/attitudes toward NAFLD and related diagnostic terms: a 68-item patient and a 41-item provider survey. Results: Surveys were completed by 1,976 patients with NAFLD across 23 countries (51% Middle East/North Africa [MENA], 19% Europe, 17% USA, 8% Southeast Asia, 5% South Asia) and 825 healthcare providers (67% gastroenterologists/hepatologists) across 25 countries (39% MENA, 28% Southeast Asia, 22% USA, 6% South Asia, 3% Europe). Of all patients, 48% ever disclosed having NAFLD/NASH to family/friends; the most commonly used term was "fatty liver" (88% at least sometimes); "metabolic disease" or "MAFLD" were rarely used (never by >84%). Regarding various perceptions of diagnostic terms by patients, there were no substantial differences between "NAFLD", "fatty liver disease (FLD)", "NASH", or "MAFLD". The most popular response was being neither comfortable nor uncomfortable with either term (56%-71%), with slightly greater discomfort with "FLD" among the US and South Asian patients (47-52% uncomfortable). Although 26% of patients reported stigma related to overweight/obesity, only 8% reported a history of stigmatization or discrimination due to NAFLD. Among providers, 38% believed that the term "fatty" was stigmatizing, while 34% believed that "nonalcoholic" was stigmatizing, more commonly in MENA (43%); 42% providers (gastroenterologists/hepatologists 45% vs. 37% other specialties, p = 0.03) believed that the name change to metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (or MASLD) might reduce stigma. Regarding the new nomenclature, the percentage of providers reporting "steatotic liver disease" as stigmatizing was low (14%). Conclusions: The perception of NAFLD stigma varies among patients, providers, geographic locations and sub-specialties. (c) 2023 European Association for the Study of the Liver. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
  • No Thumbnail Available
    Item
    The impact of stigma on quality of life and liver disease burden among patients with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease
    (2024) Younossi, Zobair M.; AlQahtani, Saleh A.; Funuyet-Salas, Jesus; Romero-Gomez, Manuel; Yilmaz, Yusuf; Keklikkiran, Caglayan; Alswat, Khalid; Yu, Ming-Lung; Liu, Chun-Jen; Fan, Jian-Gao; Zheng, Ming-Hua; Burra, Patrizia; Francque, Sven M.; Castera, Laurent; Schattenberg, Joern M.; Newsome, Philip N.; Allen, Alina M.; El-Kassas, Mohamed; Treeprasertsuk, Sombat; Hameed, Saeed; Wong, Vincent Wai-Sun; Zelber-Sagi, Shira; Takahashi, Hirokazu; Kawaguchi, Takumi; Fernandez, Marlen I. Castellanos; Duseja, Ajay; Arrese, Marco; Rinella, Mary; Singal, Ashwani K.; Gordon, Stuart C.; Fuchs, Michael; Eskridge, Wayne; Alkhouri, Naim; Cusi, Kenneth; Loomba, Rohit; Ranagan, Jane; Kautz, Achim; Ong, Janus P.; Kugelmas, Marcelo; Eguchi, Yuichiro; Diago, Moises; Gerber, Lynn; Lam, Brian; Fornaresio, Lisa; Nader, Fatema; Spearman, C. Wendy; Roberts, Stuart K.; Chan, Wah-Kheong; Silva, Marcelo; Racila, Andrei; Golabi, Pegah; Ananchuensook, Prooksa; Henry, Linda; Stepanova, Maria; Carrieri, Patrizia; Lazarus, Jeffrey, V
    Background & Aims: Patients with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD)/metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD) face a multifaceted disease burden which includes impaired health-related quality of life (HRQL) and potential stigmatization. We aimed to assess the burden of liver disease in patients with NAFLD and the relationship between experience of stigma and HRQL. Methods: Members of the Global NASH Council created a survey about disease burden in NAFLD. Participants completed a 35-item questionnaire to assess liver disease burden (LDB) (seven domains), the 36-item CLDQ-NASH (six domains) survey to assess HRQL and reported their experience with stigmatization and discrimination. Results: A total of 2,117 patients with NAFLD from 24 countries completed the LDB survey (48% Middle East and North Africa, 18% Europe, 16% USA, 18% Asia) and 778 competed CLDQ-NASH. Of the study group, 9% reported stigma due to NAFLD and 26% due to obesity. Participants who reported stigmatization due to NAFLD had substantially lower CLDQ-NASH scores (all p <0.0001). In multivariate analyses, experience with stigmatization or discrimination due to NAFLD was the strongest independent predictor of lower HRQL scores (beta from -5% to -8% of score range size, p <0.02). Experience with stigmatization due to obesity was associated with lower Activity, Emotional Health, Fatigue, and Worry domain scores, and being uncomfortable with the term "fatty liver disease" with lower Emotional Health scores (all p <0.05). In addition to stigma, the greatest disease burden as assessed by LDB was related to patients' self-blame for their liver disease. Conclusions: Stigmatization of patients with NAFLD, whether it is caused by obesity or NAFLD, is strongly and independently associated with a substantial impairment of their HRQL. Self-blame is an important part of disease burden among patients with NAFLD. Impact and implications: Patients with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD), recently renamed metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD), may experience impaired health-related quality of life and stigmatization. Using a specifically designed survey, we found that stigmatization of patients with NAFLD, whether it is caused by obesity or the liver disease per se, is strongly and independently associated with a substantial impairment of their quality of life. Physicians treating patients with NAFLD should be aware of the profound implications of stigma, the high prevalence of self-blame in the context of this disease burden, and that providers' perception may not adequately reflect patients' perspective and experience with the disease. (c) 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. on behalf of European Association for the Study of the Liver (EASL). This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).