Browsing by Author "Briones, Juan"

Now showing 1 - 5 of 5
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    A systematic review and meta-analysis of artificial intelligence versus clinicians for skin cancer diagnosis
    (2024) Salinas, María Paz; Sepúlveda, Javiera; Hidalgo, Leonel; Peirano, Dominga; Morel, Macarena; Uribe, Pablo; Rotemberg, Verónica; Briones, Juan; Mery, Domingo; Navarrete-Dechent, Cristian
    Scientific research of artificial intelligence (AI) in dermatology has increased exponentially. The objective of this study was to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the performance of AI algorithms for skin cancer classification in comparison to clinicians with different levels of expertise. Based on PRISMA guidelines, 3 electronic databases (PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library) were screened for relevant articles up to August 2022. The quality of the studies was assessed using QUADAS-2. A meta-analysis of sensitivity and specificity was performed for the accuracy of AI and clinicians. Fifty-three studies were included in the systematic review, and 19 met the inclusion criteria for the meta-analysis. Considering all studies and all subgroups of clinicians, we found a sensitivity (Sn) and specificity (Sp) of 87.0% and 77.1% for AI algorithms, respectively, and a Sn of 79.78% and Sp of 73.6% for all clinicians (overall); differences were statistically significant for both Sn and Sp. The difference between AI performance (Sn 92.5%, Sp 66.5%) vs. generalists (Sn 64.6%, Sp 72.8%), was greater, when compared with expert clinicians. Performance between AI algorithms (Sn 86.3%, Sp 78.4%) vs expert dermatologists (Sn 84.2%, Sp 74.4%) was clinically comparable. Limitations of AI algorithms in clinical practice should be considered, and future studies should focus on real-world settings, and towards AI-assistance.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Author Correction: A systematic review and meta-analysis of artificial intelligence versus clinicians for skin cancer diagnosis
    (2024) Salinas Espinoza, María Paz; Sepúlveda, Javiera; Hidalgo, Leonel; Peirano, Dominga; Morel, Macarena; Uribe, Pablo; Rotemberg, Verónica; Briones, Juan; Mery, Domingo; Navarrete Dechent, Cristian Patricio
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Complete response to immunotherapy plus chemotherapy after an unusual clinical response to afatinib and stereotactic radiosurgery in a patient with metastatic EGFR-mutant non–small-cell lung cancer
    (2020) Pizarro, Gonzalo; Pinto, Mauricio P.; Muñoz-Medel, Matías; Cordova-Delgado, Miguel; Bravo, M. Loreto; Nervi, Bruno; Sánchez, César; Ibañez, Carolina; Peña, José; Walbaum, Benjamín; Madrid, Jorge; Briones, Juan; Koch, Erica; Valbuena, Jose; Gonzalez, Sergio; Gejman, Roger; Acevedo, Francisco; Mondaca, Sebastian; Garrido, Marcelo; Vines, Eugenio; Galindo, Hector
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Regorafenib adjusted dose for Chilean patients with chemoresistant metastatic colorectal cancer: a case series
    (2018) Leal, José Luis; Briones, Juan; Herrera, María Elisa; Müller, Bettina; Nervi Nattero, Bruno; Mondaca Contreras, Sebastián Patricio
  • No Thumbnail Available
    Item
    Survival rates of advanced estrogen-receptor positive breast cancer. Analysis of 211 cases
    (2020) Sanchez, Cesar; Dominguez, Francisco; Galindo, Hector; Camus, Mauricio; Oddo, David; Villarroel, Alejandra; Razmilic, Dravna; Pena, Jose; Elena Navarro, Maria; Medina, Lidia; Merino, Tomas; Briones, Juan; Acevedo, Francisco
    Background: About 80% of breast cancer (BC) cases express estrogen receptor (ER), which has been correlated with good prognosis and response to estrogen deprivation Aim: To characterize ER positive advanced BC (ABC) patients treated at our institution assessing the impact of clinical presentation (stage IV, de novo disease at diagnosis versus systemic recurrence) and BC subtype on survival rates. Material and Methods: We evaluated 211 ER+ advanced BC (ABC) patients, treated between 1997 and 2017. Results: The median overall survival (OS) was 37 months. Median OS for the period 1997/2006 and 2007/2017 were 33 and 42 months, respectively (p = 0.47). Luminal A, ABC stage IV disease at diagnosis displayed better OS rates than Luminal B stage IV tumors (100 and 32 months respectively, p < 0.01). Conclusions: Clinical presentation (stage IV vs. systemic recurrence) and tumor subtype are key determinants of OS in ABC.