Browsing by Author "Botello, Eduardo"

Now showing 1 - 3 of 3
  • No Thumbnail Available
    Item
    Comparison between different prognostic models to be used for metastatic bone disease on appendicular skeleton in a Chilean population
    (2021) Alfaro, Patricio A.; Delgado, Javier; Dumas, Andres; Mesa, Cecilia; Wevar, Orlando; Herrera, Carlos; Padilla, Fabian; Botello, Eduardo
    Purpose Several preoperation prognosis models used on the treatment of metastatic bone disease on appendicular skeleton have been devised. The purpose of this study was to compare the performance of different survival prognostic models on patients with metastatic bone disease in long bones in a Chilean population. Methods This is a multicentric retrospective study. We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 136 patients who were confirmed with metastatic bone disease of the appendicular skeleton and who were treated surgically from 2016 to 2019. The minimum follow-up time was 12 months. All patients were assessed using four appendicular metastatic bone disease scoring systems. A preoperative predicted survival time for all 136 patients was retrospectively calculated making use of the revised Katagiri, PathFx, Optimodel and IOR score model. Results The PathFx model demonstrated an accuracy at predicting 3 (area under the curve [AUC] = 0.61) and 6-month (AUC = 0.65) survival time after surgical management. IOR score model demonstrated an accuracy at predicting 12-month survival time (AUC = 0.64). The survival rate reached the 44% in a year. The median survival time to death or last follow-up time was 14.9 months (SD +/- 15). Conclusion PathFx score model demonstrated the highest accuracy at predicting a survival time of 3 and 6 months. IOR score model was the most accurate measure at predicting a survival time of 12-months. To our knowledge, this is the first study reporting a comparative analysis of metastatic bone disease with predicting models in a country located in Latin America. PathFx's and IOR score models are the ones to be used in the Chilean population as the predictive models in metastatic bone disease of the appendicular skeleton.
  • No Thumbnail Available
    Item
    From FUSE to a hands-on electrosurgery course using a cadaveric model
    (2024) Moller, Francesca; Figueroa, Ursula; Miguieles, Mariana; Belmar, Francisca; Jarry, Cristian; Varas, Julian; Searle, Susana; Soza, Jose Francisco; Botello, Eduardo
    IntroductionSurgical procedures in contemporary practice frequently employ energy-based devices, yet comprehensive education surrounding their safety and effectiveness remains deficient. We propose an innovative course for residents that aims to provide basic electrosurgery knowledge and promote the safe use of these devices.MethodsWe developed a simulated training course for first-year general surgery and orthopedic residents. First, a survey was conducted regarding their knowledge perception about energy devices. The course consisted of two online theoretical sessions, followed by three in-person practical sessions. First-year residents performed three video-recorded attempts using a cadaveric model and were assessed through a digital platform using the Objective Structured Assessment of Technical Skill (OSATS), a Specific Rating Scale (SRS), and a surgical energy-based devices scale (SEBS). Third-year residents were recruited as a control group.ResultsThe study included 20 first-year residents and 5 third-year residents. First-year residents perceived a knowledge gap regarding energy devices. Regarding practical performance, both OSATS and checklist scores were statistically different between novices at their first attempt and the control group. When we analyzed the novice's performance, we found a significant increase in OSATS (13 vs 21), SRS (13 vs 17.5), and SEBS (5 vs 7) pre- and post-training scores. The amount of feedback referred to skin burns with the electro-scalpel reduced from 18 feedbacks in the first attempt to 2 in the third attempt (p-value = 0.0002). When comparing the final session of novices with the control group, no differences were found in the SRS (p = 0.22) or SEBS (p = 0.97), but differences remained in OSATS (p = 0.017).ConclusionThis study supports the implementation of structured education in electrosurgery among surgical trainees. By teaching first-year residents about electrosurgery, they can acquire a skill set equivalent to that of third-year residents. The integration of such courses can mitigate complications associated with energy device misuse, ultimately enhancing patient safety.
  • No Thumbnail Available
    Item
    Radiographic Assessment of Bone Quality Using 4 Radiographic Indexes: Canal Diaphysis Ratio Is Superior
    (2024) Faundez, Jorge; Carmona, Maximiliano; Klaber, Ianiv; Zamora, Tomas; Botello, Eduardo; Schweitzer, Daniel
    Background: Osteoporosis increases the risk of periprosthetic fracture and loosening in hip arthroplasty. Many methods have been proposed to assess bone quality in X-rays, including both qualitative such as the Dorr classification and quantitative such as the Calcar-Canal Ratio (CCR) and Cortical -Thickness index/Canal-Bone ratio (CTI/CBR). The Canal-Diaphysis ratio (CDR) has been described as a predictor for hip fragility fractures; however, its relationship with bone mineral density (BMD) has not been described. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the correlation of the Dorr classification, CCR, CTI/CBR, and CDR with BMD of the proximal femur in patients without hip fracture. Methods: Forty-seven patients over 45 years of age who had less than 6 months between radiographs and dual -energy X-ray absorptiometry were evaluated. Measurements of CCR, CBR, CDR, and Dorr classification were performed in all radiographs by 2 independent observers. Results: The CDR had a high correlation (r = 0.74, P=<0.01) with BMD, whereas the CTI/CBR had a moderate correlation (r = 0.49, P=<0.01), and the CCR had no correlation with BMD (r = 0.06, P = .96). When evaluating the receiver operating characteristic curve, CDR showed the best performance (area under curve [AUC] = 0.75) followed by CBR (AUC = 0.73) and CCR (AUC = 0.61). The optimal cutoff value for the CDR was 0.49, with 100% sensitivity and 58% specificity. The inter- and intra-observer variability was good for all methods. No differences were found between Dorr classification of patients who had or did not have osteoporosis. Conclusion: Of all the analyzed methods, the CDR was found to have the best correlation with BMD. This study proposes the use of CDR as a tool for assessing bone quality when deciding the implant fixation method in hip arthroplasty. (c) 2023 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.