Browsing by Author "Avendaño, María José"

Now showing 1 - 3 of 3
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Long-lasting neutralizing antibody responses in SARS-CoV-2 seropositive individuals are robustly boosted by immunization with the CoronaVac and BNT162b2 vaccines
    (2021) Muena, Nicolás A.; García Salum, Tamara Cristal; Pardo Roa, Catalina; Serrano García, Eileen Francisca; Levicán Asenjo, Jorge Enrique; Avendaño, María José; Almonacid Cárdenas, Leonardo Iván; Valenzuela Galaz, Gonzalo Hernán; Poblete Cárdenas, Estefany Aracely; Strohmeier, Shirin; Salinas Ortíz, Erick David; Haslwanter, Denise; Dieterle, Maria Eugenia; Jangra, Rohit K.; Chandran, Kartik; González, Claudia; Riquelme Pérez, Arnoldo Javier; Krammer, Florian; Tischler, Nicole D.; Medina, Rafael
    The durability of circulating neutralizing antibody (nAb) responses to severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection and their boosting by vaccination remains to be defined. We show that outpatient and hospitalized SARS-CoV-2 seropositive individuals mount a robust neutralizing antibody (nAb) response that peaks at days 23 and 27 post-symptom onset, respectively. Although nAb titers remained higher in hospitalized patients, both study groups showed long-lasting nAb responses that can persist for up to 12 months after natural infection. These nAb responses in previously seropositive individuals can be significantly boosted through immunization with two doses of the CoronaVac (Sinovac) or one dose of the BNT162b2 (BioNTech/Pfizer) vaccines, suggesting a substantial induction of B cell memory responses. Noteworthy, three obese previously seropositive individuals failed to mount a booster response upon vaccination, warranting further studies in this population. Immunization of naïve individuals with two doses of the CoronaVac vaccine or one dose of the BNT162b2 vaccine elicited similar levels of nAbs compared to seropositive individuals 4.2 to 13.3 months post-infection with SARS-CoV-2. Thus, this preliminary evidence suggests that both, seropositive and naïve individuals, require two doses of CoronaVac to ensure the induction of robust nAb titers.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Preserved Omicron Spike specific antibody binding and Fc-recognition across COVID-19 vaccine platforms
    (2021) Bartsch, Y.; Tong, X.; Kang, J.; Alter, G.; Avendaño, María José; Serrano, Eileen F.; García-Salum, Tamara; Pardo-Roa, Catalina; Riquelme, Arnoldo; Medina, Rafael A.
    Despite the dramatic spread of Omicron globally, even among highly vaccinated populations, death rates have not increased concomitantly. These data argue that alternative immune mechanisms, beyond neutralization, may continue to confer protection against severe disease. Beyond their ability to bind and block infection, antibodies contribute to control and clearance of multiple infections via their ability to direct antiviral immunity via Fc-effector mechanisms. Thus, here we probed the ability of vaccine induced antibodies, across three COVID-19 vaccines, to drive Fc-effector activity against Omicron. Despite the significant loss of IgM, IgA and IgG binding to the Omicron Receptor Binding Domain (RBD) across BNT162b2, mRNA-1273, and CoronaVac vaccines, stable isotype binding was observed across all of these vaccines to the Omicron Spike. Compromised RBD binding IgG was accompanied by a significant loss of cross RBD-specific antibody Fcγ-receptor binding by the CoronaVac vaccine, but preservation of RBD-specific FcγR2a and Fcγ3a binding across the mRNA vaccines. Conversely, Spike-specific antibodies exhibited persistent binding to Fcγ-receptors, across all three vaccines, albeit higher binding was observed with the mRNA vaccines, marked by a selective preservation of FcγR2a and Fcγ3a binding antibodies. Thus, despite the significant to near complete loss of Omicron neutralization across several vaccine platforms against Omicron, vaccine induced Spike-specific antibodies continue to recognize the virus and recruit Fc-receptors pointing to a persistent capacity for extra-neutralizing antibodies to contribute Omicron disease attenuation.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Viral shedding dynamics reveals sputum as a reliable and cost-saving specimen for SARS-CoV-2 diagnosis within the first 10 days since symptom onset: A prospective cohort study
    (2020) Levican, Jorge; Almonacid, Leonardo I.; Valenzuela, Gonzalo; García-Salum, Tamara; Rojas, Luis; Serrano, Eileen; Pardo-Roa, Catalina; Salinas, Erick; Avendaño, María José; Perazzo, Fabiola; Díaz, Luis Antonio; Valderrama, Sebastián; Ortega, Marcos; Toro, Adriana; Montecinos, Viviana; Riquelme, Arnoldo; Medina, Rafael A.
    Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) caused by the severe acute respiratory syndrome virus (SARS-CoV-2) is challenging global public health, due to an increasing demand for testing and the shortage of diagnostic supplies. Nasopharyngeal swab (NPS) is considered the optimal sample for SARS-CoV2 diagnosis and sputum (SPT) has been proposed as an economic alternative. However, the temporal concordance of diagnosis in NPS and SPT has not been addressed. Methods: Through a longitudinal study we compared the shedding dynamics of SARS-CoV-2 RNA evaluated by RT-qPCR in serially collected SPT and NPS obtained from 82 ambulatory and hospitalized patients during acute infection and convalescence. The concordance during the follow-up and cost analysis between both collected specimens was evaluated. Findings: We analyzed 379 samples, 177 NPS and 202 SPT. The highest proportion of positive samples was detected within the first 15 days after the symptoms onset. The median time of positivity was higher for NPS (median= 25 days) than SPT (median= 21 days). There was no significant difference in the median RT-qPCR CT values between both sample types. The temporal categorization of matched-paired samples indicated substantial correlation (r=0·6023) and substantial agreement (87·23%) during the first ten days since symptoms onset (kappa = 0·697). A cost analysis demonstrated a significant saving when the SPT specimen was used. Interpretation: Sputum is a feasible and cost-saving alternative to NPS, providing an equivalent value for the detection and follow-up of SARS-CoV-2 RNA.